Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao BJOG An Internationa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
HAL Descartes
Article . 2024
Data sources: HAL Descartes
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
HAL-CEA
Article . 2024
Data sources: HAL-CEA
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
HAL INRAE
Article . 2024
Data sources: HAL INRAE
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Safety of Fertility Treatments in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data From a Prospective Population‐Based Study

Authors: Dernoncourt, Amandine; Guettrot-Imbert, Gaëlle; Sentilhes, Loïc; Besse, Marie Charlotte; Molto, Anna; Queyrel-Moranne, Viviane; Besnerais, Maelle Le; +21 Authors

Safety of Fertility Treatments in Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data From a Prospective Population‐Based Study

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo assess safety of fertility treatments in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).DesignData from the multicentre French observational GR2 (Groupe de Recherche sur la Grossesse et les Maladies Rares) study (2014‐ongoing).SettingSeventy‐six centres in France.PopulationAll pregnancies in women with SLE enrolled in the GR2 study, conceived before 1 August 2022, with available end‐of‐pregnancy data and known conception type, were included; that is, 577 spontaneous and 53 assisted pregnancies.MethodsA comparative analysis of spontaneous and assisted pregnancies was conducted. Logistic regression was used to determine if fertility treatments were independently associated with live birth prognosis, adjusting for confounders (e.g., maternal age). Kaplan–Meier analysis compared cumulative incidences of disease flares and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), with confounding factors adjusted using a Cox regression model.Main Outcome MeasuresLive birth, disease flares, and APOs.ResultsThe mean age was older (35.8 vs. 32.3 years, p < 1 × 10−4), and twins were more frequent in assisted pregnancies (5/50, 10.0% vs. 20/554, 3.6%; p = 0.047). Lupus disease was clinically inactive at baseline in 51 (96.2%) assisted pregnancies (vs. n = 511, 89.6%; p = 0.15), with 35 of 45 (77.8%) having no chronic damage (vs. 448/513, 87.3%; p = 0.07). The live birth rate was similar between assisted and spontaneous pregnancies (n = 46, 86.8% vs. n = 505, 87.5%; p = 0.83), with no statistical difference in the incidence of lupus flares and APOs. These results remained consistent after adjusting for confounding factors.ConclusionsFertility treatments in women with mostly well‐controlled SLE did not appear to increase risks of maternal and neonatal complications, supporting current recommendations.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02450396

Keywords

Adult, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, MESH: Lupus Erythematosus, 610, [SDV.MHEP.GEO]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Gynecology and obstetrics, in vitro fertilisation, 618, MESH: Pregnancy, systemic lupus erythematosus, Pregnancy, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, MESH: Infertility, Prospective Studies, MESH: Reproductive Techniques, MESH: Humans, pregnancy outcome, Systemic, Pregnancy Outcome, high‐risk, MESH: Adult, MESH: Pregnancy Outcome, MESH: Prospective Studies, MESH: France, Pregnancy Complications, [SDV.MHEP.GEO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Gynecology and obstetrics, reproductive techniques, MESH: Pregnancy Complications, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, MESH: Live Birth, [SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Female, pregnancy, France, assisted, MESH: Female, Live Birth, Infertility, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
INRAE
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!