
Abstract Introduction Achieving a slow and smooth electrode array insertion is paramount for preserving structural and functional integrity during cochlear implantation. This controlled study evaluates the efficacy of a metronome-guided insertion technique in enhancing the smoothness and speed of electrode array insertions. Methods In a prospective cohort study, patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery between 2022 and 2023 with lateral wall electrode arrays were included. Metronome guidance was delivered through an acoustic signal via headphones during electrode array insertion in cochlear implantation and compared to a control group without metronome-guidance. Results In total, 37 cases were evaluated, including 25 conventional insertions and 12 metronome-guided insertions. The results indicate that metronome-guided insertions were significantly slower (− 0.46 mm/s; p < 0.001) without extending the overall procedure time. This can be attributed to fewer paused sections observed in the metronome-guided technique. Moreover, metronome-guided insertions exhibited superior performance in terms of insertion smoothness and a reduced number of re-gripping events. Conclusions The findings support the recommendation for the systematic application of metronome guidance in the manual insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays, emphasizing its potential to optimize surgical outcomes.
Male, Adult, Adolescent, Hearing preservation ; Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Insertion monitoring ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Electrodes, Implanted [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Otology ; Cochlear Implantation/methods [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Insertion friction ; Cochlear Implants [MeSH] ; Free fitting electrode array ; Child [MeSH] ; Robotic cochlear implantation ; Child, Preschool [MeSH], Otology, Middle Aged, Cochlear Implantation, Electrodes, Implanted, Cochlear Implants, Child, Preschool, Otology ; Hearing preservation ; Insertion monitoring ; Robotic cochlear implantation ; Insertion friction ; Free fitting electrode array, Humans, Female, Human medicine, Prospective Studies, Child, Aged, ddc: ddc:
Male, Adult, Adolescent, Hearing preservation ; Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Insertion monitoring ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Prospective Studies [MeSH] ; Electrodes, Implanted [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Otology ; Cochlear Implantation/methods [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Insertion friction ; Cochlear Implants [MeSH] ; Free fitting electrode array ; Child [MeSH] ; Robotic cochlear implantation ; Child, Preschool [MeSH], Otology, Middle Aged, Cochlear Implantation, Electrodes, Implanted, Cochlear Implants, Child, Preschool, Otology ; Hearing preservation ; Insertion monitoring ; Robotic cochlear implantation ; Insertion friction ; Free fitting electrode array, Humans, Female, Human medicine, Prospective Studies, Child, Aged, ddc: ddc:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
