
doi: 10.1002/nme.4513
handle: 11381/2621247
SUMMARYMany‐body dynamics problems are expected to handle millions of unknowns when, for instance, investigating the three‐dimensional flow of granular material. Unfortunately, the size of the problems tractable by existing numerical solution techniques is severely limited on convergence grounds. This is typically the case when the equations of motion embed a differential variational inequality problem that captures contact and possibly frictional interactions between rigid and/or flexible bodies. As the size of the physical system increases, the speed and/or the quality of the numerical solution decreases. This paper describes three methods – the gradient projected minimum residual method, the preconditioned spectral projected gradient with fallback method, and the modified proportioning with reduced gradient projection method – that demonstrate better scalability than the projected Jacobi and Gauss–Seidel methods commonly used to solve contact problems that draw on a differential‐variational‐inequality‐based modeling approach. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Iterative numerical methods for linear systems, differential equations, Contact in solid mechanics, 510, 620, solids, Spectral and related methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, multibody dynamics, Complementarity and equilibrium problems and variational inequalities (finite dimensions) (aspects of mathematical programming), contact, Numerical methods for variational inequalities and related problems
Iterative numerical methods for linear systems, differential equations, Contact in solid mechanics, 510, 620, solids, Spectral and related methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, multibody dynamics, Complementarity and equilibrium problems and variational inequalities (finite dimensions) (aspects of mathematical programming), contact, Numerical methods for variational inequalities and related problems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
