Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Patient Preference a...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Patient Preference and Adherence
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Patient Preference and Adherence
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Exploring the Perspectives of Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Patients on Self-Management: A Qualitative Interview Study Using the COM-B Model

Authors: Ruimei Jia; Nina Xie; Yue Li; Yu Zhang;

Exploring the Perspectives of Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Patients on Self-Management: A Qualitative Interview Study Using the COM-B Model

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lung cancer chemotherapy patients’ self-management behaviors were not satisfactory, especially treatment-related management scored low compared to other management. This study used the capability, opportunity, and motivation-behavior (COM-B) model of behavioral change to explore the perspectives when performing self-management. METHODS: The study employed semi-structured interviews with 15 patients undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancer. The COM-B model was utilized to guide the development of interview themes and to inform the content analysis methods applied. RESULTS: The study identified three main themes and eight sub-themes. These included: (1) Competency factors, which encompassed poor management of symptoms and chemotherapy side effects, as well as a lack of patient self-management awareness; (2) Motivational factors, which involved the complexity of the chemotherapy regimen reducing patients’ confidence in treatment management, insufficient family support, and a lack of patients’ sense of meaning in life with low future expectations; and (3) Opportunity factors, which included financial burden preventing patients from practicing self-management of their disease, lack of access to authoritative knowledge, and limited opportunities to practice self-management. CONCLUSION: This study proposes targeted interventions based on the research findings, including strengthening symptom management for patients, enhancing patients’ knowledge of self-management of health through health training, seminars, and peer exchange meetings, and providing further opportunities for patient self-management by establishing family support networks, community peer support groups, and constructing authoritative health information platforms. By linking social resources, the economic pressure on patients is alleviated. Our research results will contribute to comprehensive self-management for lung cancer chemotherapy patients.

Keywords

Medicine (General), ability, R5-920, Lung cancer chemotherapy, opportunity, motivation-behavior model, behavioral research, qualitative interviews, Original Research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research