Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Colorectal Diseasearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Colorectal Disease
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability of multi‐slice CT and three‐dimensional reconstructed imaging analysis of mesenteric vascular anatomy for planning and performing complete mesocolic excision

Authors: Jordan Fletcher; Phillip Lung; Ellen Van Eetvelde; Claus Anders Bertelsen; Adam Stearns; Kristian Storli; Danilo Miskovic;

Inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability of multi‐slice CT and three‐dimensional reconstructed imaging analysis of mesenteric vascular anatomy for planning and performing complete mesocolic excision

Abstract

AbstractAimComplete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer has been associated with improved oncological outcomes but requires a detailed understanding of complex mesenteric vasculature. Three‐dimensional (3D) reconstructed models derived from patient imaging could enhance preoperative anatomical comprehension, enabling safer, precision CME.MethodsIn this two‐phase, blinded, crossover study, four expert CME surgeons evaluated mesenteric vascular anatomy on CT scans and 3D models. In phase 1, surgeons assessed 66 cases, while 20 were re‐evaluated in phase 2. The primary outcome measure was inter‐rater reliability by Fleiss's kappa. Secondary outcomes were intra‐rater reliability by Cohen's kappa and anatomical accuracy rates measured as a percentage of correct responses on a standardised questionnaire.ResultsIn phase 1, inter‐rater agreement was higher for 3D models (average kappa 0.6, moderate agreement) than for CT scans (average kappa 0.1, poor agreement). Ileocolic vein drainage and ileocolic artery trajectory showed the highest kappa values with 3D imaging (0.85 and 0.93, respectively). Accuracy was also superior with 3D across all surgeons (mean 89.7% correct) versus CT (mean 79.1% correct, P < 0.001). In phase 2, intra‐rater reliability remained higher for 3D (average Cohen's kappa 0.61) than CT scans (Cohen's kappa 0.27).Conclusion3D mesenteric models significantly improve inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability among CME experts over traditional CT scans while markedly enhancing anatomical comprehension accuracy about critical right‐sided colonic vasculature. 3D planning could facilitate CME by enabling superior preoperative visualisation of these vessels.

Keywords

Mesenteric Veins/diagnostic imaging, Male, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods, Mesentery/diagnostic imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Mesenteric Veins, Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods, Mesocolon/surgery, CME, Multidetector Computed Tomography, cancer, Humans, Single-Blind Method, Mesentery, Colectomy, Aged, Observer Variation, Cross-Over Studies, colon, Colonic Neoplasms/surgery, imaging, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Colectomy/methods, Mesenteric Arteries, Mesenteric Arteries/diagnostic imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods, Colonic Neoplasms, Female, reproducibility of results, planning, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, 3D, Research Article, Mesocolon

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research