
Quantum invariants in low dimensional topology offer a wide variety of valuable invariants of knots and 3-manifolds, presented by explicit formulas that are readily computable. Their computational complexity has been actively studied and is tightly connected to topological quantum computing. In this article, we prove that for any 3-manifold quantum invariant in the Reshetikhin-Turaev model, there is a deterministic polynomial time algorithm that, given as input an arbitrary closed 3-manifold $M$, outputs a closed 3-manifold $M'$ with same quantum invariant, such that $M'$ is hyperbolic, contains no low genus embedded incompressible surface, and is presented by a strongly irreducible Heegaard diagram. Our construction relies on properties of Heegaard splittings and the Hempel distance. At the level of computational complexity, this proves that the hardness of computing a given quantum invariant of 3-manifolds is preserved even when severely restricting the topology and the combinatorics of the input. This positively answers a question raised by Samperton.
18 pages, 6 figures
Computational Geometry (cs.CG), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum invariant, polynomial time reduction, Computational Geometry, Geometric Topology (math.GT), Heegaard splitting, [INFO.INFO-CG] Computer Science [cs]/Computational Geometry [cs.CG], Geometric Topology, FOS: Mathematics, Hempel distance, 3-manifold, ddc: ddc:004
Computational Geometry (cs.CG), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum invariant, polynomial time reduction, Computational Geometry, Geometric Topology (math.GT), Heegaard splitting, [INFO.INFO-CG] Computer Science [cs]/Computational Geometry [cs.CG], Geometric Topology, FOS: Mathematics, Hempel distance, 3-manifold, ddc: ddc:004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
