
The analogue of Hilbert's tenth problem over $\mathbb{Q}$ asks for an algorithm to decide the existence of rational points in algebraic varieties over this field. This remains as one of the main open problems in the area of undecidability in number theory. Besides the existence of rational points, there is also considerable interest in the problem of effectivity: one asks whether the sought rational points satisfy determined height bounds, often expressed in terms of the height of the coefficients of the equations defining the algebraic varieties under consideration. We show that, in fact, Hilbert's tenth problem over $\mathbb{Q}$ with (finitely many) height comparison conditions is undecidable.
References updated
Mathematics - Number Theory, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Logic, Number Theory (math.NT), Logic (math.LO), Primary: 11U05, Secondary: 11C08, 11G50
Mathematics - Number Theory, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Logic, Number Theory (math.NT), Logic (math.LO), Primary: 11U05, Secondary: 11C08, 11G50
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
