
handle: 10419/301881 , 10419/260614
AbstractEconomic zones can be powerful drivers of economic growth in developing countries. However, less is known about their distributional impact on the local society. This paper provides empirical evidence from Indonesian provinces on the relationship between economic zones and within-province income inequality. We apply fixed-effects panel estimation to province-level data for the whole of Indonesia, which we then complement with separate studies on the opening of three economic zones in three provinces using the synthetic control method. The results suggest that the above relationship is positive overall. The estimated rise in income inequality after a zone opens is, however, relatively small on average and may be short-lived. Moreover, the average estimate masks large regional differences, which suggests that the inequality implications of economic zone policies depend on local conditions. One possible explanation for the rise in inequality is that the unskilled population benefits disproportionately less from the policy.
Synthetic control method, ddc:330, income distribution, economic zones, O25, O15, synthetic control method, Economic zones, Indonesia, 502027 Politische Ökonomie, Income distribution, 502027 Political economy, Place-based policy, D31, place-based policy, F63
Synthetic control method, ddc:330, income distribution, economic zones, O25, O15, synthetic control method, Economic zones, Indonesia, 502027 Politische Ökonomie, Income distribution, 502027 Political economy, Place-based policy, D31, place-based policy, F63
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
