
pmid: 39334226
pmc: PMC11437814
AbstractEnvironmental cleaning is essential to patient and health worker safety, yet it is a substantially neglected area in terms of knowledge, practice, and capacity-building, especially in resource-limited settings. Public health advocacy, research and investment are urgently needed to develop and implement cost-effective interventions to improve environmental cleanliness and, thus, overall healthcare quality and safety. We outline here the CLEAN Group Consensus exercise yielding twelve urgent research questions, grouped into four thematic areas: standards, system strengthening, behaviour change, and innovation.
Medical Microbiology - Radboud University Medical Center, Cross Infection, Infection Control, Consensus, Research, Comment, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, Housekeeping, Hospital, Disinfection, Healthcare facilities, Healthcare Environmental Hygiene and Patient Safety ; Disinfection/methods [MeSH] ; Research priorities ; Consensus [MeSH] ; Comment [Healthcare facilities ; Health Facilities [MeSH] ; Cross Infection/prevention ; Housekeeping, Hospital/standards [MeSH] ; Infection Control/methods [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Environment cleaning ; Research [MeSH] ; Clean Hospitals], Humans, Health Facilities, Environment cleaning, Research priorities
Medical Microbiology - Radboud University Medical Center, Cross Infection, Infection Control, Consensus, Research, Comment, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, Housekeeping, Hospital, Disinfection, Healthcare facilities, Healthcare Environmental Hygiene and Patient Safety ; Disinfection/methods [MeSH] ; Research priorities ; Consensus [MeSH] ; Comment [Healthcare facilities ; Health Facilities [MeSH] ; Cross Infection/prevention ; Housekeeping, Hospital/standards [MeSH] ; Infection Control/methods [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Environment cleaning ; Research [MeSH] ; Clean Hospitals], Humans, Health Facilities, Environment cleaning, Research priorities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
