
The article presents the concept of engineering education development based on engineering master course models and broad engineering bachelor programs that are founded on the principles of continuity and interdisciplinary approach considering international best practices [1]. ideas forming the foundation of this concept are widely discussed in the academic sphere with active participation of professional communities and go in line with best practices of international engineering education [2]. Opinion and recommendations of employers are formed during round tables and interviews conducted with the aim of researching the needs in engineering and technological competencies for modern industry [3]. From the point of view of technological importance for university management system the most interesting models are those related to network forms of implementing educational programs and recommendations on creating pillar chairs, real mechanisms of partnership with companies, educational and research institutions. The most vivid peculiarities of higher education are the training results methodology [4], educational projects and partnership require testing and bet practice analysis that would lead to newly developed norms and methodology. The article presents original conceptual solutions of higher engineering school of UrFU in terms of introducing new engineering education models [5].
NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION FORMS, ПАРТНЕРСТВО, BASIC CHAIRS, PARTNERSHIP, ШИРОКИЙ БАКАЛАВРИАТ, BROAD BACHELOR COURSE, БАЗОВЫЕ КАФЕДРЫ, ИНЖЕНЕРНАЯ МАГИСТРАТУРА, ENGINEERING MASTER COURSES, СЕТЕВЫЕ ФОРМЫ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ
NETWORK IMPLEMENTATION FORMS, ПАРТНЕРСТВО, BASIC CHAIRS, PARTNERSHIP, ШИРОКИЙ БАКАЛАВРИАТ, BROAD BACHELOR COURSE, БАЗОВЫЕ КАФЕДРЫ, ИНЖЕНЕРНАЯ МАГИСТРАТУРА, ENGINEERING MASTER COURSES, СЕТЕВЫЕ ФОРМЫ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
