Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YUHSpace (Yonsei Uni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical Imaging
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation: how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?

Authors: Ki Keun Oh; Byeong Woo Park; Eun Ju Son; Min Jung Kim; Ki Chang Keum; Eun Kyung Kim;

Treatment-planning CT scan for breast and chest-wall irradiation: how many unexpected abnormalities could we detect?

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnostic interpretation of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images for radiation planning in breast irradiation detects a considerable number of unexpected abnormalities.One hundred thirty-one patients underwent treatment-planning CT scans for breast or chest-wall irradiation. A diagnostic radiologist prospectively reviewed each scan and determined the incidence of previously unknown findings, the impacts of such findings on treatment, and the need for additional radiological studies based on the CT interpretation.Eighty-six scans were prospectively classified as negative findings, 27 scans were classified as incidental benign findings, 26 scans were classified as medically important findings of which only one case was metastatic.The incidence of clinically important coexistent diseases in CT scans for radiation planning in breast irradiation is very low, although the CT scans were performed with intravenous contrast administration insofar as the preoperative evaluation was appropriate.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Contrast enhancement, Radiotherapy Planning, 610, Breast Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy, Breast cancer, Humans, Thoracic Neoplasms/epidemiology*, Thoracic/statistics & numerical data*, Tomography, Computed tomography (CT), Aged, Incidental Findings, Korea/epidemiology, Korea, Breast neoplasm, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data*, Incidence, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data*, Unexpected lesions, Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology*, Middle Aged, Thoracic Neoplasms, Radiography, Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*, Female, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Thoracic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*, Treatment planning

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research