Care of the acutely injured trauma patient is integral to the practice of emergency medicine. It is currently unknown how most emergency medicine residencies structure their residents' trauma experience and little guidance for competency assessment is provided by the Residency Review Committee. Our study aimed to determine current emergency medicine residency practices in trauma resuscitation.We conducted a cross-sectional survey of members of the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD) listserv in April 2023. Frequency with percentage of item responses is reported and differences across trauma levels assessed via Fisher's exact test (α = 0.05).Fifty-seven program directors responded to the survey (21.9%), the majority of whom operate at Level I facilities. Significantly more Level II/ III centers send residents to other sites for trauma experience compared to Level I (p = 0.000). Residents participate in all key procedures (eg, airway management, central venous access) when managing traumas except thoracotomy where participation was notably lower and statistically different across levels (p = 0.000). Lastly, program directors were very confident their residents can lead traumas independently and few acknowledged citations for deficiency in trauma training.Trauma training and confirmation of competency is critical among EM residents who may serve as the sole lead in rural emergency departments. This study demonstrates that there is considerable variability in how residency programs structure trauma education, particularly with regards to the exposure to invasive procedures and the opportunity to lead trauma resuscitations. As the American Board of Emergency Medicine has introduced requirements for program directors to attest specifically to the competence of residents to lead trauma resuscitations, standardized and validated tools should be adopted to support this attestation and ensure competence regardless of the program hospital's trauma level.