
doi: 10.1111/sifp.70022
AbstractThe well‐being of individuals and communities is increasingly recognized as a core objective of economic and global development policies and programs. However, existing measures of well‐being neglect sexual and reproductive experiences, which are core dimensions of people's lives. While there has been increasing attention to the concept of sexual well‐being, measures of sexual and reproductive health are predominantly deficit‐based and ignore whether people are having positive experiences. To consider the development of a measure of sexual and reproductive well‐being, a multidisciplinary and geographically diverse group of experts was convened. Outcomes of this meeting included endorsement of a draft definition of sexual and reproductive well‐being, demonstrated enthusiasm and commitment to the development of a measure capturing this construct, and delineation of core considerations in the measure development process. These included considering the diversity of normative and political contexts around sexuality and reproduction, and the critical nature of meaningful community engagement when developing this measure. A pathway for measuring development was defined, with the goal of creating a concise measure assessing people's holistic experiences of sexuality and reproduction that can draw attention to and monitor the extent to which people are having the sexual and reproductive lives they wish to have.
INDICATORS, HAPPINESS, Science & Technology, Social Sciences, PATIENT, 1603 Demography, VALIDATION, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 4206 Public health, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Demography, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
INDICATORS, HAPPINESS, Science & Technology, Social Sciences, PATIENT, 1603 Demography, VALIDATION, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 4206 Public health, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Demography, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
