
handle: 10044/1/84086 , 2440/133489 , 11586/243257
There are an estimated 14,000 randomized trials published in chronic kidney disease. The most frequently reported outcomes are biochemical endpoints, rather than clinical and patient-reported outcomes including cardiovascular disease, mortality, and quality of life. While many trials have focused on optimizing kidney health, the heterogeneity and uncertain relevance of outcomes reported across trials may limit their policy and practice impact. The international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) Initiative was formed to identify core outcomes that are critically important to patients and health professionals, to be reported consistently across trials. We convened a SONG Implementation Workshop to discuss the implementation of core outcomes. Eighty-two patients/caregivers and health professionals participated in plenary and breakout discussions. In this report, we summarize the findings of the workshop in two main themes: socializing the concept of core outcomes, and demonstrating feasibility and usability. We outline implementation strategies and pathways to be established through partnership with stakeholders, which may bolster acceptance and reporting of core outcomes in trials, and encourage their use by end-users such as guideline producers and policymakers to help improve patient-important outcomes.
Comparative Effectiveness Research, HEMODIALYSIS, Kidney Disease, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], kidney disease, patient-centered care, outcomes, chronic - therapy, Stakeholder participation, Renal Insufficiency, chronic - physiopathology, Chronic, Treatment outcome, implementation, chronic - mortality, chronic - diagnosis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research design - standards, SETS, trials, trial, Urology & Nephrology, core outcome sets, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Treatment Outcome, CONSENSUS WORKSHOP, Research Design, outcome, HEALTH, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, CLINICAL-TRIALS, PRIORITIES, Human, DOMAINS, Consensus, Endpoint Determination, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Clinical Sciences, Renal and urogenital, 610, SONG Implementation Workshop Investigators, Consensu, core outcome set, PATIENT, CONSISTENCY, Clinical Research, Stakeholder Participation, Humans, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Renal insufficiency, Endpoint determination - standards, Science & Technology, TRANSPLANTATION, 3202 Clinical sciences, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Good Health and Well Being, Generic health relevance, Randomized controlled trials as topic - standards
Comparative Effectiveness Research, HEMODIALYSIS, Kidney Disease, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], kidney disease, patient-centered care, outcomes, chronic - therapy, Stakeholder participation, Renal Insufficiency, chronic - physiopathology, Chronic, Treatment outcome, implementation, chronic - mortality, chronic - diagnosis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research design - standards, SETS, trials, trial, Urology & Nephrology, core outcome sets, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Treatment Outcome, CONSENSUS WORKSHOP, Research Design, outcome, HEALTH, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, CLINICAL-TRIALS, PRIORITIES, Human, DOMAINS, Consensus, Endpoint Determination, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Clinical Sciences, Renal and urogenital, 610, SONG Implementation Workshop Investigators, Consensu, core outcome set, PATIENT, CONSISTENCY, Clinical Research, Stakeholder Participation, Humans, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Renal insufficiency, Endpoint determination - standards, Science & Technology, TRANSPLANTATION, 3202 Clinical sciences, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Good Health and Well Being, Generic health relevance, Randomized controlled trials as topic - standards
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 186 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
