
Abstract In primates, foveal and peripheral vision have distinct neural architectures and functions. However, it has been debated if selective attention operates via the same or different neural mechanisms across eccentricities. We tested these alternative accounts by examining the effects of selective attention on the steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) and the fronto-parietal signal measured via EEG from human subjects performing a sustained visuospatial attention task. With a negligible level of eye movements, both SSVEP and SND exhibited the heterogeneous patterns of attentional modulations across eccentricities. Specifically, the attentional modulations of these signals peaked at the parafoveal locations and such modulations wore off as visual stimuli appeared closer to the fovea or further away towards the periphery. However, with a relatively higher level of eye movements, the heterogeneous patterns of attentional modulations of these neural signals were less robust. These data demonstrate that the top-down influence of covert visuospatial attention on early sensory processing in human cortex depends on eccentricity and the level of saccadic responses. Taken together, the results suggest that sustained visuospatial attention operates differently across different eccentric locations, providing new understanding of how attention augments sensory representations regardless of where the attended stimulus appears.
Male, Saccadic masking, Eye movement, Eye Movements, Biochemistry, Foveal, Neuronal Adaptation, Cognitive psychology, Retinal, Psychology, Attention, EEG, Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks, Visual perception, Q, R, Life Sciences, Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Control and Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Stimulus (psychology), FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, FOS: Psychology, Visual Perception, Medicine, Female, Perceptual Learning, Adult, Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Processing, Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Article, Eccentricity, Young Adult, Frontoparietal cortex, Attentional Networks, Humans, Visual cortex, Biology, SSVEP, Visual spatial attention, Linguistics, Philosophy, Foveal vision, FOS: Languages and literature, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Sensory system, Covert, Perception, Peripheral vision, Photic Stimulation, Neuroscience
Male, Saccadic masking, Eye movement, Eye Movements, Biochemistry, Foveal, Neuronal Adaptation, Cognitive psychology, Retinal, Psychology, Attention, EEG, Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks, Visual perception, Q, R, Life Sciences, Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Control and Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Stimulus (psychology), FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, FOS: Psychology, Visual Perception, Medicine, Female, Perceptual Learning, Adult, Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception and Processing, Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Article, Eccentricity, Young Adult, Frontoparietal cortex, Attentional Networks, Humans, Visual cortex, Biology, SSVEP, Visual spatial attention, Linguistics, Philosophy, Foveal vision, FOS: Languages and literature, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Sensory system, Covert, Perception, Peripheral vision, Photic Stimulation, Neuroscience
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
