
The extant literature is replete with fine-grained explanations of problems of electoral irregularities in Nigeria. However, how political interference in election administration contributes to these problems has largely remained unacknowledged. The Nigerian Constitution establishes the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as a relatively autonomous electoral body and, also, empowers the president to appoint its principal officers subject to Senate confirmation. These provisions that allow interested parties to determine INEC membership composition delink INEC’s institutional design from its operational independence and, therefore, incapacitate it from asserting its independence in order to guarantee credible elections in Nigeria. The present study relies on a triangulation of qualitative research techniques such as documentary sources, key informant interviews, and personal observations. Premised on descriptive statistics and content analyses, this study reveals that political interference in INEC membership composition and financing considerably accounts for recurring lethal electoral irregularities; shows that whoever controls the human and financial elements of INEC is in firm control of its operations for favourable electoral outcomes; and suggests the need for voter-determined reforms for a workable electoral system in the context and content of Nigeria.
illiberal democracy, electoral irregularities, DT1-3415, election administration, Nigeria, History of Africa, International relations, political interference, JZ2-6530
illiberal democracy, electoral irregularities, DT1-3415, election administration, Nigeria, History of Africa, International relations, political interference, JZ2-6530
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
