Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Organizat...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
EconStor
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: EconStor
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Team Virtuality and Innovation: A Meta‐Analysis of the Moderating Role of Team Design

Authors: Matthias Felix Sinnemann; Matthias Michael Weiss;

Team Virtuality and Innovation: A Meta‐Analysis of the Moderating Role of Team Design

Abstract

ABSTRACTOrganizations are dependent on the generation and implementation of new ideas to creatively solve the world's problems with innovative solutions. Simultaneously, organizations are increasingly facing heightened team virtuality, which describes the collaboration of geographically dispersed team members using electronic communication. In this context, prior research highlights both positive and negative consequences of team virtuality but has not come to a consensus on how it affects team innovation. Therefore, this meta‐analysis synthesizes 167 effect sizes from 132 independent samples comprising a total of 7004 teams to obtain in‐depth insights into the impact of team virtuality on team innovation. Considering the overall assessment of the relationship between team virtuality and team innovation, no significant effect could be revealed. By identifying potential moderators derived from the premises of the team effectiveness model, our results indicate that the relationship between team virtuality and team innovation varies with team composition, task design, and team context. As revealed through meta‐analytic regression, the influence between team virtuality and team innovation is significantly moderated by task design (i.e., divergent vs. convergent) and the type of technology utilized by the teams (i.e., text‐based vs. audio‐based vs. video‐based communication).

Related Organizations
Keywords

ddc:650, team effectiveness model, team virtuality, team innovation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid