Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparative analysis of robot-assisted and open approach for PSMA-radioguided surgery in recurrent prostate cancer

Authors: Francesca Ambrosini; Fabian Falkenbach; Lars Budäus; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Daniel Koehler; Sophie Knipper; +1 Authors

Comparative analysis of robot-assisted and open approach for PSMA-radioguided surgery in recurrent prostate cancer

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To compare the oncological and surgical outcomes of patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent either open or newly established robot-assisted salvage prostate-specific membrane antigen–radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS). Materials and methods Patients who consecutively underwent PSMA-RGS for PCa recurrence between January 2021 and December 2022 were identified. The rate of complete biochemical response, biochemical recurrence-free survival [BFS], and the rate of salvage therapy were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable regression models tested the association between the surgical approach and surgical outcomes. Results Overall, 85 patients were selected, with 61 patients (72%) undergoing open PSMA-RGS and 24 patients (28%) receiving a robot-assisted approach. The oncological outcomes of the two groups were comparable (12-month BFS: 41% (Confidence interval (CI): 29–58%) vs. 39% (CI: 19–79%), p = 0.9, respectively). According to multivariable regression models, the robotic approach did not significantly influence estimated blood loss (EBL) (β = −40, 95% CI: −103, 22; p = 0.2) and significantly increased operative time (OT) (β = 28, 95% CI: 10, 46; p = 0.002). No Clavien-Dindo III–V complications were reported in the robotic group. Conclusion Both, the open as well as the robot-assisted approach for PSMA-RGS had comparable oncological outcomes. No safety concerns arose for the robotic-assisted approach offering a potentially improved quality of life for patients.

Country
Germany
Keywords

Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II/metabolism [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Prostate-specific membrane antigen–radioguided surgery ; Humans [MeSH] ; Treatment Outcome [MeSH] ; Retrospective Studies [MeSH] ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Antigens, Surface/metabolism [MeSH] ; Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods [MeSH] ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery [MeSH] ; Recurrence [MeSH] ; Original Article ; Male [MeSH] ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery [MeSH] ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods [MeSH] ; Salvage lymph node dissection ; Prostate cancer, Male, Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II, Prostatic Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Recurrence, Antigens, Surface, Humans, Original Article, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research