The increasing demand for mobility worldwide has led to an ever-increasing expansion of railway networks. Such a rapid expansion poses a challenge to guaranteeing quality, reliability, efficiency, and, most importantly, safety of railway infrastructure. Under this perspective, continuous monitoring emerges as a promising alternative to the traditionally adopted visual inspections, or inspections via portable measuring devices, which aim at collecting geometric data for the diagnosis and prognosis of defects in tracks. Recently, railway operators worldwide have adopted the use of dedicated Track Recording Vehicles equipped with optical and inertial sensors to collect data from tracks and assess their condition. Such an approach revolutionized rail condition assessment, introducing a mobile data acquisition platform for track inspection. On the other hand, the deployment of such specialized vehicles requires disruption of regular rail service, which hinders their frequent operation and thus the continuous collection of rail data. This work aims to tackle this limitation by examining an onboard monitoring (OBM) method that hinges on collecting vibration data from in-service trains. The proposed methodology relies on the collection of acceleration data from axle boxes of trains running at normal speeds. Its novelty lies in the usage of realistic train models and the consideration of the dynamic interaction between rails and trains, which is usually simplistically ignored. The adopted train models are reduced so as to decrease the required computational effort. The identification task is based on sequential Bayesian inference for joint input and state estimation, thereby also accounting for uncertainties related to the train model. Estimating the input leads to the identification of the pertinent rail roughness profile, which can subsequently provide information on the existence of isolated defects, for example, welded joints and squats, along the track system. This study is limited to reliable prediction of the dynamics of the train–track system in the vertical direction, but proposes methods and tools of general value.

ISSN:2191-5644

ISSN:2191-5652