
To examine whether low managerial quality predicts risk of depressive disorders.Using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analyses we examined the prospective association of individual-level and workplace-mean managerial quality with onset of depressive disorders among 5244 eldercare workers from 274 workplaces during 20 months follow-up.Low managerial quality predicted onset of depressive disorders in both the individual-level (odds ratio [OR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.25 to 2.76) and the workplace-mean analysis (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.06 to 2.07). Low individual-level managerial quality predicted onset of depressive disorders when workplace-mean managerial quality was high (OR = 3.10, 95% CI = 1.71 to 5.62) but not when it was low (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.87). This interaction was statistically significant (P = 0.03).Both low individual-level and low workplace-mean managerial quality predicted risk of depressive disorders. The association was strongest among individuals reporting low managerial quality at workplaces with high workplace-mean managerial quality.
Adult, Male, Denmark, Caregivers/psychology, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Prospective Studies, Workplace, Occupational Health, Depressive Disorder, Administrative Personnel, Depressive Disorder/epidemiology, Original Articles, Middle Aged, Denmark/epidemiology, Leadership, Caregivers, Administrative Personnel/standards, Homes for the Aged/organization & administration, Workplace/organization & administration, Female
Adult, Male, Denmark, Caregivers/psychology, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Prospective Studies, Workplace, Occupational Health, Depressive Disorder, Administrative Personnel, Depressive Disorder/epidemiology, Original Articles, Middle Aged, Denmark/epidemiology, Leadership, Caregivers, Administrative Personnel/standards, Homes for the Aged/organization & administration, Workplace/organization & administration, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
