Facções de Fortaleza y colectivos de Caracas: Dos modelos de gobernanza criminal
Copyright policy )Facções de Fortaleza y colectivos de Caracas: Dos modelos de gobernanza criminal
This paper comparares the criminal governance carried out by the Guardiões do Estado facção (faction), in Fortaleza, Brazil, and the Alexis Vive and La Piedrita colectivos (collectives) in Caracas, Venezuela. Comparing their origins, their use of violence, their capacity to establish rules and impose punishments, their sources of income, the way they obtain legitimacy and their relations with the state, we conclude that these are two different models of criminal governance, which different in the way they prioritise the goals of economic profit and political domination.
This paper compares the criminal governance carried out by the Guardiões do Estado facção (faction), in Fortaleza, Brazil, and the Alexis Vive and La Piedrita colectivos (collectives) in Caracas, Venezuela. Comparing their origins, their use of violence, their capacity to establish rules and impose punishments, their sources of income, the way they obtain legitimacy and their relations with the state, we conclude that these are two different models of criminal governance, which differ in the way they prioritise the goals of economic profit and political domination.
This paper compares the criminal governance carried out by the Guardiões do Estado facção (faction), in Fortaleza, Brazil, and the Alexis Vive and La Piedrita colectivos (collectives) in Caracas, Venezuela. Comparing their origins, their use of violence, their capacity to establish rules and impose punishments, their sources of income, the way they obtain legitimacy and their relations with the state, we conclude that these are two different models of criminal governance, which differ in the way they prioritise the goals of economic profit and political domination.
تقارن هذه الورقة الحكم الجنائي الذي نفذه الحرس الوطني (فصيل)، في فورتاليزا، البرازيل، وأليكسيس فيف ولا بيدريتا كولكتيفوس (تعاونيات) في كاراكاس، فنزويلا. وبمقارنة أصولهم، واستخدامهم للعنف، وقدرتهم على وضع القواعد وفرض العقوبات، ومصادر دخلهم، وطريقة حصولهم على الشرعية وعلاقاتهم بالدولة، نستنتج أن هذين نموذجين مختلفين للحكم الجنائي، يختلفان في الطريقة التي يعطيان بها الأولوية لأهداف الربح الاقتصادي والهيمنة السياسية.
- Universidade Federal do Pará Brazil
- UNIVERSIDADE DE SAO PAULO Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Ceará Brazil
- Central University of Venezuela Venezuela
criminal governance, Sociology and Political Science, Economics, FOS: Political science, economic profit, facções, Social Sciences, objetivos políticos, Criminal Justice and Social Control Systems, FOS: Law, coletivos, HM401-1281, Humanities, Sociology, political goals, colectivos, Sociology (General), Political science, lucro económico, Politics, gobernanza criminal, colectivos, ‘facções’, lucro económico, metas políticas, gobernanza criminal, FOS: Humanities, collectives, ‘facções’, metas políticas, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Philosophy, Impact of Social Structure on Crime and Delinquency, lucro econômico, Organized Crime and Criminal Networks Analysis, Crime, Welfare economics, governança criminal, Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform, Law, HN1-995, Legitimacy
criminal governance, Sociology and Political Science, Economics, FOS: Political science, economic profit, facções, Social Sciences, objetivos políticos, Criminal Justice and Social Control Systems, FOS: Law, coletivos, HM401-1281, Humanities, Sociology, political goals, colectivos, Sociology (General), Political science, lucro económico, Politics, gobernanza criminal, colectivos, ‘facções’, lucro económico, metas políticas, gobernanza criminal, FOS: Humanities, collectives, ‘facções’, metas políticas, FOS: Sociology, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Philosophy, Impact of Social Structure on Crime and Delinquency, lucro econômico, Organized Crime and Criminal Networks Analysis, Crime, Welfare economics, governança criminal, Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform, Law, HN1-995, Legitimacy
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!