
AbstractThe introduction of clinical criteria for the operationalization of psychosis high risk provided a basis for early detection and treatment of vulnerable individuals. However, about two-thirds of people meeting clinical high-risk (CHR) criteria will never develop a psychotic disorder. In the effort to increase prognostic precision, structural and functional neuroimaging have received growing attention as a potentially useful resource in the prediction of psychotic transition in CHR patients. The present review summarizes current research on neuroimaging biomarkers in the CHR state, with a particular focus on their prognostic utility and limitations. Large, multimodal/multicenter studies are warranted to address issues important for clinical applicability such as generalizability and replicability, standardization of clinical definitions and neuroimaging methods, and consideration of contextual factors (e.g., age, comorbidity).
Psychotic Disorders, Expert Review ; Neuroscience ; Psychotic Disorders/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Neuroimaging [MeSH] ; Comorbidity [MeSH] ; Biomarkers [MeSH] ; Schizophrenia ; Disease Susceptibility [MeSH], Humans, Neuroimaging, Comorbidity, Disease Susceptibility, Expert Review, Biomarkers
Psychotic Disorders, Expert Review ; Neuroscience ; Psychotic Disorders/diagnostic imaging [MeSH] ; Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Neuroimaging [MeSH] ; Comorbidity [MeSH] ; Biomarkers [MeSH] ; Schizophrenia ; Disease Susceptibility [MeSH], Humans, Neuroimaging, Comorbidity, Disease Susceptibility, Expert Review, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
