
This qualitative study explores the understanding and perspectives of faculty in US library and information science (LIS) programs about teaching web accessibility. “Web accessibility” can be defined simply as making websites accessible for all, including people with disabilities. Eight LIS professors and two graduate LIS students or recent alumni with interests in accessibility were interviewed for the study. Results showed that, although some faculty were novices, most interviewees thought it would be beneficial to teach web accessibility in a variety of LIS courses. However, despite the seeming consensus, discussion of incorporating web accessibility into curricula was rare. This study explores possible reasons for the marginalization of web accessibility in LIS. The authors contend that greater support for initiatives to integrate web accessibility into LIS curricula is essential for enabling LIS practitioners to comply with legal standards and with LIS values of inclusion.
SocArXiv|Education|Disability and Equity in Education|Accessibility, Disability and Equity in Education, FOS: Law, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, Disability Law, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Human Ecology, Sociology, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Disability and Society, bepress|Education|Disability and Equity in Education|Accessibility, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, bepress|Law|Disability Law, bepress|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, Accessibility, SocArXiv|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, bepress|Law, FOS: Sociology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, SocArXiv|Education, Disability and Society, bepress|Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Law, SocArXiv|Law|Disability Law, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Law, Library and Information Science
SocArXiv|Education|Disability and Equity in Education|Accessibility, Disability and Equity in Education, FOS: Law, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, Disability Law, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Human Ecology, Sociology, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology|Disability and Society, bepress|Education|Disability and Equity in Education|Accessibility, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, bepress|Law|Disability Law, bepress|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, Accessibility, SocArXiv|Education|Disability and Equity in Education, bepress|Law, FOS: Sociology, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Sociology, SocArXiv|Education, Disability and Society, bepress|Education, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Library and Information Science, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Law, SocArXiv|Law|Disability Law, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Law, Library and Information Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
