
To evaluate the utility of topographic and pachymetric parameters of Scheimpflug system in keratoconus diagnosis.This study included 183 eyes of 183 patients with keratoconus (keratoconus group) and 131 eyes of 131 age and sex-matched healthy subjects (control group). Mean keratometry (K, front), topographic astigmatism, pupil-center pachymetry, apical pachymetry, thinnest pachymetry (TP), corneal volume and maximum K (Kmax) were obtained from the Scheimpflug imaging system. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the diagnostic ability of each parameter in eyes with ≤ stage 3, ≤ stage 2 and stage 1 keratoconus based on the Amsler-Krumeich grading system.The Kmax and TP showed the highest individual performance (with sensitivity-specificity of 92.9-92.4% and 89.6-93.3%, respectively) in diagnosis of keratoconus. The AUCs and sensitivity-specificity values for the Kmax/TP and Kmax(2)/TP were calculated to improve the diagnostic performance. As expected, sensitivity-specificity values significantly increased by using Kmax/TP (97.3-94.7% at the level ≥0.08) and Kmax(2)/TP (99.5-95.7% at the level ≥4.1) in discrimination of keratoconic eyes from normals. Moreover, Kmax(2)/TP had very high sensitivity (>99%) and specificity (>94%) in diagnosis of stage 1 and stage 2 keratoconus.Although Kmax and TP appear to have high diagnostic ability in keratoconus, the use of either single parameter in isolation might be unsatisfactory in differential diagnosis. Therefore, the Kmax(2)/TP ratio has been introduced, which reflects major characteristics of keratoconus and might be used as an important criterion in keratoconus diagnosis.
Male, Corneal Pachymetry, retrospective study, Computer-Assisted, Diagnosis, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, comparative study, Adolescent; Adult; *Algorithms; Corneal Pachymetry/*methods; Corneal Topography/*methods; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*methods; Female; Humans; Keratoconus/classification/*diagnosis; Male; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Young Adult, receiver operating characteristic, adult, imaging system, corneal pachymetry, cornea thickness, astigmatism, female, priority journal, classification, young adult, diagnostic accuracy, Female, Maximum keratometry, Algorithms, Adult, Adolescent, keratoconus, 610, keratometry, Keratoconus, Sensitivity and Specificity, Article, Young Adult, evaluation study, male, 616, Humans, controlled study, diagnostic test accuracy study, human, procedures, reproducibility, algorithm, Corneal Topography, Reproducibility of Results, computer assisted diagnosis, Pachymetry, major clinical study, Index, sensitivity and specificity, adolescent
Male, Corneal Pachymetry, retrospective study, Computer-Assisted, Diagnosis, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, comparative study, Adolescent; Adult; *Algorithms; Corneal Pachymetry/*methods; Corneal Topography/*methods; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/*methods; Female; Humans; Keratoconus/classification/*diagnosis; Male; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Young Adult, receiver operating characteristic, adult, imaging system, corneal pachymetry, cornea thickness, astigmatism, female, priority journal, classification, young adult, diagnostic accuracy, Female, Maximum keratometry, Algorithms, Adult, Adolescent, keratoconus, 610, keratometry, Keratoconus, Sensitivity and Specificity, Article, Young Adult, evaluation study, male, 616, Humans, controlled study, diagnostic test accuracy study, human, procedures, reproducibility, algorithm, Corneal Topography, Reproducibility of Results, computer assisted diagnosis, Pachymetry, major clinical study, Index, sensitivity and specificity, adolescent
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
