
pmid: 35650349
pmc: PMC9630392
Abstract Purpose Perceived discomfort could indicate an early sign of pain, for example, as a result of a biomechanical load on the musculoskeletal system. Assessing discomfort can, therefore, help to identify workers at increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders for targeted intervention development. We aimed: (1) to identify the optimal cut-off value of neck and low back discomfort among office workers and (2) to evaluate its predictive validity with future neck and low back pain, respectively. Methods At baseline healthy participants (n = 100) completed questionnaires, including the Borg CR-10 discomfort scale (on a 0–10 scale), and were followed for six months, during which musculoskeletal pain was assessed monthly. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the associations of baseline discomfort with the onset of future neck or low back pain. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve were estimated to identify the optimal discomfort cut-off value predicting future pain. Results Borg CR-10 scores ≥ 3.5 for perceived neck and low back discomfort had acceptable sensitivity and specificity to predict future neck and low back pain, respectively. Perceived discomfort at baseline as a dichotomous measure (using the ≥ 3.5 cut-off) was a statistically significant predictor of future neck pain (OR = 10.33) and low back pain (OR = 11.81). Conclusion We identified the optimal cut-off value of the Borg CR-10 discomfort scale to identify office workers at increased risk of developing neck and low back pain. These findings might benefit ergonomists, primary health care providers, and occupational health researchers in developing targeted interventions.
Alternative medicine, Social Psychology, Predictive validity, Health Professions, Social Sciences, Logistic regression, Poison control, Receiver operating characteristic, Global Burden of Chronic Pain, Visual analogue scale, Musculoskeletal Pain, Posture Analysis, Neck pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Sciences, Workstation Ergonomics, Pathology, Humans, Psychology, Low back pain, Internal medicine, Pharmacology, Neck Pain, Musculoskeletal Symptoms, Ergonomics and Human Factors in Technology Use, Rehabilitation, Back pain, Musculoskeletal disorder, Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentistry, Occupational Diseases, FOS: Psychology, Medical Laboratory Technology, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Human factors and ergonomics, Medicine, Emergency medicine, Original Article, Work-related Pain, Office workers, Low Back Pain, Physical therapy, Discomfort, Neck
Alternative medicine, Social Psychology, Predictive validity, Health Professions, Social Sciences, Logistic regression, Poison control, Receiver operating characteristic, Global Burden of Chronic Pain, Visual analogue scale, Musculoskeletal Pain, Posture Analysis, Neck pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Sciences, Workstation Ergonomics, Pathology, Humans, Psychology, Low back pain, Internal medicine, Pharmacology, Neck Pain, Musculoskeletal Symptoms, Ergonomics and Human Factors in Technology Use, Rehabilitation, Back pain, Musculoskeletal disorder, Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Dentistry, Occupational Diseases, FOS: Psychology, Medical Laboratory Technology, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Human factors and ergonomics, Medicine, Emergency medicine, Original Article, Work-related Pain, Office workers, Low Back Pain, Physical therapy, Discomfort, Neck
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
