Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Radboud Repositoryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Radboud Repository
Article . 2025
Data sources: Radboud Repository
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Clinical Benefit and Safety of Reduced Elective Dose in Definitive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors: Sven van den Bosch; Patricia A.H. Doornaert; Frank J.P. Hoebers; Bas Kreike; Marije R. Vergeer; Ellen M. Zwijnenburg; Maurice C. Cox; +3 Authors

Clinical Benefit and Safety of Reduced Elective Dose in Definitive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

PURPOSE Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant long-term toxicity with elective neck irradiation (ENI) as a major contributor. In this multicenter randomized trial, the clinical benefit and safety of definitive RT with reduced versus standard elective dose were compared. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC were accrued and treated in five Dutch centers (definitive accelerated RT, 68 Gy in 34 fractions in 5.5 weeks). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were not eligible. Dose for ENI was randomly assigned (2:1; dose reduction, 43 Gy, versus control, 50 Gy). The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the dose reduction group with the null hypothesis rejected if the upper-bound one-sided 95% CI exceeded 9%. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2022, 300 patients were randomnly assigned, of whom 295 were evaluable and included in analysis (dose reduction, 196 and control, 99). The mean normalcy of diet score at 1 year was 91.6 (95% CI, 88.5 to 94.7) in the dose reduction group and 92.6 (95% CI, 88.2 to 97.1) in the control group (mean difference, –1.1 [95% CI, –6.5 to 4.4]). The 2-year recurrence rate in electively irradiated nodes in the dose reduction group was 4.9% (upper-bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.5%). In the control group, this was 4.3% (upper bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.7%). Exploratory analyses demonstrated less acute dysphagia grade ≥3 and better xerostomia-related quality of life in the dose reduction group. CONCLUSION This is the second randomized controlled trial demonstrating that reduced elective dose is safe in definitive RT for HNC.

Keywords

Medical Imaging - Radboud University Medical Center, Radiation Oncology - Radboud University Medical Center

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research