
This article argues that a crucial step towards a more nuanced understanding of civil society conflicts surrounding the mobility transition is the adoption of a spatial perspective, which considers the navigation of the involved levels of governance. To this end, we propose an analytical approach based on Conflict Field Analysis, the Embedded Agency Perspective, and multi-level governance theory: a multi-level analysis of spatially embedded conflicts. The aim of this article is to conduct a qualitative case study on how civil society actors engage with the multi-level governance system in the conflict over cycling conditions in Bavaria between 2017 and 2023. We identify three modes of engagement: firstly, addressing the established governance levels according to their respective competencies; secondly, challenging the allocation of decision-making powers across governance levels; and thirdly, co-creating new governance levels.
The paper is published by the European Journal of Spatial Development (EJSD).The previous version of the journal was host by Nordregio.
Spatial planning, Conflict, SDG 11 – Nachhaltige Städte und Gemeinden, conflict, sustainable mobility, Sustainable Mobility, HT101-395, SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities, Raumforschung, Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology, 507011 Raumforschung, Multi-level governance, 507011 Spatial research, multi-level governance, spatial planning, Civil society
Spatial planning, Conflict, SDG 11 – Nachhaltige Städte und Gemeinden, conflict, sustainable mobility, Sustainable Mobility, HT101-395, SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities, Raumforschung, Urban groups. The city. Urban sociology, 507011 Raumforschung, Multi-level governance, 507011 Spatial research, multi-level governance, spatial planning, Civil society
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
