
Recurrent cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease, with limited treatment options available when disease progression occurs after first-line combination therapy.We conducted a phase 3, multinational, open-label trial of tisotumab vedotin as second- or third-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive tisotumab vedotin monotherapy (2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (topotecan, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, or pemetrexed). The primary end point was overall survival.A total of 502 patients underwent randomization (253 were assigned to the tisotumab vedotin group and 249 to the chemotherapy group); the groups were similar with respect to demographic and disease characteristics. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the tisotumab vedotin group than in the chemotherapy group (11.5 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 9.8 to 14.9] vs. 9.5 months [95% CI, 7.9 to 10.7]), results that represented a 30% lower risk of death with tisotumab vedotin than with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.89; two-sided P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 4.4) with tisotumab vedotin and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.1) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; two-sided P<0.001). The confirmed objective response rate was 17.8% in the tisotumab vedotin group and 5.2% in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.6; two-sided P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of patients in the tisotumab vedotin group and 99.2% in the chemotherapy group had at least one adverse event that occurred during the treatment period (defined as the period from day 1 of dose 1 until 30 days after the last dose); grade 3 or greater events occurred in 52.0% and 62.3%, respectively. A total of 14.8% of patients stopped tisotumab vedotin treatment because of toxic effects.In patients with recurrent cervical cancer, second- or third-line treatment with tisotumab vedotin resulted in significantly greater efficacy than chemotherapy. (Funded by Genmab and Seagen [acquired by Pfizer]; innovaTV 301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04697628.).
Adult, Oncologie, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage, Sciences de la santé humaine, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy, Human health sciences, Medical Oncology - Radboud University Medical Center, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Progression-Free Survival, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy, Oncology, Female, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Oligopeptides
Adult, Oncologie, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage, Sciences de la santé humaine, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy, Human health sciences, Medical Oncology - Radboud University Medical Center, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Progression-Free Survival, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy, Oncology, Female, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Oligopeptides
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
