
Objective To detect the role of pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and multifocal electroretinogram (MfERG) for macular function evaluation in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) treated by fingolimod. Patients and methods This prospective research was carried out on 25 patients with RR-MS (50 eyes), treated by fingolimod, with no ophthalmic disorders or complaints before the onset of the treatment, including no history of optic neuritis. PERG, MfERG, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography were performed before then 3 and 6 months after the treatment. Results Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly decreased in third and sixth months compared to baseline (P<0.001). Central macular thickness showed nonsignificant change. PERG waveform abnormalities were detected in 2.5% of patients at third month (P=0.9) and 27.5% in sixth month (P<0.001). PERG P50 amplitude nonsignificantly decreased in third month (P=0.6), then significantly decreased at sixth month (P=0.021). PERG N95 amplitude showed no significant difference (P=0.345). MfERG revealed nonsignificant decrease of P1 amplitude of all five rings at third and sixth months. The duration of MS had significant negative correlations with BCVA, amplitude, and amplitude change of P1 of both ring 1 and ring 2. Conclusion Treatment with fingolimod for 6 months led to a significant reduction in BCVA and PERG responses and a slight decrease in P1 amplitude of MfERG before detection of any structural macular changes by optical coherence tomography. This indicates the role of PERG and MfERG as biomarkers for the early detection of macular function alteration in RR-MS fingolimod-treated cases.
elapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, Ophthalmology, optical coherence tomography, multifocal electroretinogram, fingolimod, RE1-994, pattern electroretinogram
elapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, Ophthalmology, optical coherence tomography, multifocal electroretinogram, fingolimod, RE1-994, pattern electroretinogram
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
