
ObjectiveTo explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy.DesignNested case–control study.SettingTwelve NHS hospitals in England.PopulationAll nonmultiple births from women selected as cases or controls from a cohort of women with both colposcopy and a hospital birth. Cases had a preterm (20–36 weeks of gestation) birth. Controls had a term birth (38–42 weeks) and no preterm.MethodsObstetric, colposcopy and pathology details were obtained.Main outcome measuresAdjusted odds ratio of preterm birth in first and second or subsequent births following treatment for cervical disease.ResultsA total of 2798 births (1021 preterm) from 2001 women were included in the analysis. The risk of preterm birth increased with increasing depth of treatment among first births post treatment [trend per category increase in depth, categories <10 mm, 10–14 mm, 15–19 mm, ≥20 mm: odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.12–1.36, P < 0.001] and among second and subsequent births post treatment (trend OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15–1.56, P < 0.001). No trend was observed among births before colposcopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.16, P = 0.855). The absolute risk of a preterm birth following deep treatments (≥15 mm) was 6.5% among births before colposcopy, 18.9% among first births and 17.2% among second and subsequent births post treatment. Risk of preterm birth (once depth was accounted for) did not differ when comparing first births post colposcopy with second and subsequent births post colposcopy (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89–1.49).ConclusionsThe increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is not restricted to the first birth post colposcopy; it remains for second and subsequent births. These results suggest that once a woman has a deep treatment she remains at higher risk of a preterm birth throughout her reproductive life.Tweetable abstractRisk of preterm birth following large treatments for cervical disease remains for second and subsequent births.
Adult, 330, 610, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Research Support, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Journal Article, Odds Ratio, Humans, conisation, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Non-U.S. Gov't, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, General Obstetrics, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Multicenter Study, large loop excision of the transformation zone, England, Colposcopy, Case-Control Studies, Premature Birth, Female, preterm delivery
Adult, 330, 610, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Research Support, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Journal Article, Odds Ratio, Humans, conisation, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Non-U.S. Gov't, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, General Obstetrics, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Multicenter Study, large loop excision of the transformation zone, England, Colposcopy, Case-Control Studies, Premature Birth, Female, preterm delivery
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
