You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Von Forschungsdaten und wissenschaftlichen Sammlungen
Copyright policy )Von Forschungsdaten und wissenschaftlichen Sammlungen
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: media_common.quotation_subject Library science Art Research data media_common
General Medicine
General Medicine
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: media_common.quotation_subject Library science Art Research data media_common
1712
Andorfer, Peter (2015): Forschungsdaten in den (digitalen) Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Konkretisierung. (DARIAH-DE Working Papers 14). Göttingen: DARIAH-DE. Verfügbar unter urn: nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2015-7-2.
Braunberger, Gerald: Digitale Revolution. Macht der Maschinen. In: FAZ vom 27.04.2014. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/me nschen-wirtschaft/digitale-revolution-macht-der-maschinen-12 910372.html.
Buller, Andreas (2002): Die Geschichtstheorien des 19. Jahrhunderts: Das Verhältnis zwischen historischer Wirklichkeit und historischer Erkenntnis bei Karl Marx und Johann Gustav Droysen. Berlin: Logos-Verlag.
Curall, J.; Moss, M.; Stuart, S. (2004): What is a collection? In: Archivaria, 58, 131-46.
Gold, Matthew K. (2012): Debates in the digital humanities. Minneapolis, Minn.: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
Jordan, Stefan (2010): Vetorecht der Quellen, Version: 1.0. In: Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte, 11.2.2010. Verfügbar unter https://docupe dia.de/zg/Vetorecht_der_Quellen.
Klimpel, Paul; Weitzmann, John H. (2015): „Forschen in der digitalen Welt. Juristische Handreichungen für die Geisteswissenschaften“. (DARIAH-DE Working Papers 12). Göttingen: DARIAH-DE. Verfügbar unter urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2015-5-0.
Koselleck, Reinhart (1977): Standortbindung und Zeitlichkeit. Ein Beitrag zur historiographischen Erschließung der geschichtlichen Welt. In: Objektivität und Parteilichkeit in der Geschichtswissenschaft, hg. v. Reinhart Koselleck, Wolfgang J. Mommsen und Jörn Rüsen. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag.
Lee, Hur‐Li (2005): The Concept of Collection from the User's Perspective. In: The Library Quarterly, 75 (1), 67-85. DOI: 10.1086/ 428693.
Logoze, Carl; Fielding, David (1998): Defining collections in distributed digital libraries. In: D-Lib Magazine, 4 (11). Verfügbar unter h ttp://dlib.org/dlib/november98/lagoze/11lagoze.html.
- 1
- 2
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).2 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).2 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!