publication . Article . 2003

The Archaeologist Undeceived: Selecting Quality Archaeological Information from the Internet

Paul Sturges; Anne Griffin;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Jan 2003 Journal: Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, volume 6, pages 221-232 (issn: 1547-9684, eissn: 1521-4672, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Informing Science Institute
The amount of unreliable information and actual misinformation available via the Internet makes its use problematic for academic purposes, particularly for data-intensive disciplines such as archaeology. Whilst there are many sources for reviews of websites, few apply the type of criteria most appropriate to archaeology. Information and library professionals have developed sets of criteria that can be adapted for the evaluation of archaeological websites. An evaluative tool for archaeological websites, using al-ready-available criteria, was developed and tested on twenty archaeological web sites. It proved capable of allowing its user to make clear distinctions ...
free text keywords: archaeology, evaluation, Internet, quality, web sites, lcsh:Information technology, lcsh:T58.5-58.64
Related Organizations
Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage
22 references, page 1 of 2

Aguillo, I. (2000). A new generation of tools for search recovery and quality evaluation of World Wide Web medical resources. Online Information Review, 24, 138-143.

Alexander, J. & Tate, M.A. (2001) Evaluating web resources: Checklist for an informational web page. Retrieved June 24, 2002 from

Bauer, C. & Scharl, A. (2000). Quantitative evaluation of Web site content and structure. Library Computing, 19, 134-146.

Brown-Syed, C. (2001). Determining authoritativeness on the Web: An exploration of the content and roles of academics' Web pages. Library and Archival Security, 17, 43-70.

Carroll, R.T. (2002). The skeptic's dictionary. Retrieved November 9, 2002 from

Champion, S. (1997). Archaeology on the World Wide Web: A user's field guide. Antiquity, 71, 274. Retrieved July 20, 2002 from

Ciolek, T.M. (1996) The six quests for the electronic grail: Current approaches to information quality in WWW resources. Revue Informatique et Statistique dans les Sciences Humaines, 91, 45-71.

Collins, B.R. (1996, February). Beyond cruising: Reviewing. Library Journal, 122-124.

Cooke, A. (1999). Neal-Schuman authoritative guide to evaluating information on the Internet. NetGuide Series. New York: Neal-Schuman.

Cooke, A. (2001). A guide to finding quality information on the Internet: selection and evaluation. London: Library Association Publishing.

Gorman, M. (1995). The corruption of cataloguing. Library Journal, 120, 34.

Hersh, W.R. et al. (1998). Applicability and quality of information for answering clinical questions on the Web. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1307-1308.

Humbul Humanities Hub (2002). Archaeology. Retrieved August 20, 2002 from

Katz, W. (1997) Introduction to reference work. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

Koopman, A. & Hay, S. (1994) Swim at your own risk - no librarian on duty: Large-scale application of Mosaic in an academic library. In Electronic Proceedings of the Second World Wide Web Conference '94: Mosaic and the Web. Chicago, IL: National Center for Supercomputing Applications, 1994. Retrieved August 10 2002 from

22 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue