publication . Article . 2018

Surgery for Young Adults With Aortic Valve Disease not Amenable to Repair.

Alexandru Ciprian Visan;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Mar 2018 Journal: Frontiers in Surgery, volume 5 (eissn: 2296-875X, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
  • Country: United Kingdom
Abstract
<p>Aortic valve replacement is the gold standard for the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis or mixed pathology that is not amenable to repair according to currently available guidelines. Such a simplified approach may be suitable for many patients, but it is far from ideal for young adults considering emerging evidence demonstrating that conventional valve replacement in this cohort of patients is associated with inferior long-term survival when compared to the general population. Moreover; the utilisation of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves can significantly impact on quality and is linked to increased rates of morbidities. Other available op...
Subjects
free text keywords: /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/centre_for_surgical_research, Centre for Surgical Research, /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/pubmedpublicationtype/D016428, Journal Article, aortic valve replacement, ross operation, homograft, young adult, aortic stenosis, Surgery, RD1-811, Review
Related Organizations
74 references, page 1 of 5

1 Nishimura RA Otto CM Bonow RO 2014 AHA / ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease A Report of the American College of Cardiology /American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014.

2 Vahanian A Alfieri O Andreotti F Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): The Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg (2012) 42(4):S1–44. [OpenAIRE]

3 Rahimtoola SH The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation (1978) 58(1):20–4.10.1161/01.CIR.58.1.20 348341 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

4 Rao V Jamieson WR Ivanov J Armstrong S David TE Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation (2000) 102(19 Suppl 3):III-5–0.10.1161/01.CIR.102.suppl_3.III-5 11082354 [PubMed] [DOI]

5 Lund O Magnussen K Knudsen M Pilegaard H Nielsen TT Albrechtsen OK The potential for normal long term survival and morbidity rates after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis (1996) 5(3):258–67.8793673 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed]

6 Lund O Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification o f long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation (1990) 82(1):124–39.10.1161/01.CIR.82.1.124 2364510 [PubMed] [DOI]

7 Bouhout I Stevens LM Mazine A Poirier N Cartier R Demers P Long-term outcomes after elective isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement in young adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2014) 148(4):1341–6.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.064 24332113 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

8 Ruel M Kulik A Lam BK Rubens FD Hendry PJ Masters RG Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2005) 27(3):425–33.10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.002 15740951 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

9 Dunning J Gao H Chambers J Moat N Murphy G Pagano D Aortic valve surgery: marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve use--an analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the society for cardiothoracic surgery in Great Britain and Ireland national database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (2011) 142(4):776–82.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.048 21924147 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

10 Forcillo J El Hamamsy I Stevens LM Badrudin D Pellerin M Perrault LP The perimount valve in the ao rtic position: twenty-year experience with patients under 60 years old. Ann Thorac Surg (2014) 97(5):1526–32.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.019 24681031 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

11 Welke KF Wu Y Grunkemeier GL Ahmad A Starr A Long-term results after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve implantation, with attention to the impact of age. Heart Surg Forum (2011) 14(3):160 10.1532/HSF98.20101140 [DOI]

12 Kvidal P Bergström R Hörte LG Ståhle E Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol (2000) 35(3):747–56.10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00584-7 10716479 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

13 Puskas JD Bavaria JE Svensson LG Blackstone EH Griffith B Gammie JS The COMMENCE trial: 2-year outcomes with an aortic bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg (2017) 52(3):432–9.10.1093/ejcts/ezx158 28605428 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

14 Yacoub MH El-Hamamsy I Sievers HH Carabello BA Bonow RO Stelzer P Under-use of the Ross operation--a lost opportunity. Lancet (2014) 384(9943):559–60.10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61090-4 25131967 [PubMed] [DOI]

15 Treasure T Hasan A Yacoub M Is there a risk in avoiding risk for younger patients with aortic valve disease?BMJ (2011) 342:d2466 10.1136/bmj.d2466 21622509 [OpenAIRE] [PubMed] [DOI]

74 references, page 1 of 5
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue