publication . Article . 2015

LONE RANGER DECISION MAKING VERSUS CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS

Maite Sara Mashego;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Nov 2015 Journal: Journal of Governance and Regulation (issn: 2220-9352, eissn: 2306-6784, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Publishing house "Virtus Interpress"
Abstract
<jats:p>Consensus decision making, concerns group members make decisions together with the requirement of reaching a consensus that is all members abiding by the decision outcome. Lone ranging worked for sometime in a autocratic environment. Researchers are now pointing to consensus decision-making in organizations bringing dividend to many organizations. This article used a descriptive analysis to compare the goodness of consensus decision making and making lone ranging decision management. This article explored the models, roles, tools and methods of consensus decision making. The results were that consensus decision making brings people together and cements t...
Subjects
free text keywords: Decision Making, Lone Ranger’s Decisions, Consensus Decisions, Organizational behaviour, change and effectiveness. Corporate culture, HD58.7-58.95, Finance, HG1-9999, Management science, Descriptive statistics, Psychology, Management, Consensus decision-making
19 references, page 1 of 2

Bressen, T. (2007). Consensus decision making. The Change Handbook: The Definitive Resource on Today's Best Methods for Engaging Whole Systems 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 212-7.

Burton-Jones, A. (2001). Knowledge capitalism: Business, work, and learning in the new economy.

Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. [OpenAIRE]

Journal of counseling psychology, 52(2), 224.

4. Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(2), 224.

5. Hartnett, T. (2011). Consensus-oriented decisionmaking: the codm model for facilitating groups to widespread agreement. New society publishers.

6. Krathwohl, D. R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. Longman/Addison Wesley Longman.

7. Lessig, L. (2006). Code. Lawrence Lessig.

8. Merriam-Webster Inc. (2004). Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary. Merriam-Webster.

9. Merton, T. (2012). The Choice. Returning to Reality: Thomas Merton's Wisdom for a Technological World, 87.

10. Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E., & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 834.

11. Mohammed, S., & Ringseis, E. (2001). Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 310- 335.

12. Muo, I., & Oghojafor, B. E. A. (2012). OHAZURUME: The Philosophy and Practice of Decision Making and Consensus Building among the Ndigbo of Nigeria. American Journal of Business and Management, 1(3), 154-161. [OpenAIRE]

13. Robson, C. (2002). Real word research. Oxford: Blackwell.

14. Saint, S., & Lawson, J. R. (1994). Rules for reaching consensus: a modern approach to decision making. Pfeiffer.

19 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Article . 2015

LONE RANGER DECISION MAKING VERSUS CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS

Maite Sara Mashego;