Aronoff M.Meir I.Sandler W. (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81 301–344. 10.1353/lan.2005.0043 22223926

Bayley R.Lucas C.Rose M. (2002). Phonological variation in American Sign Language: the case of 1 handshape. Lang. Var. Change 14 19–53. 10.1017/S0954394502141020

Bentz C.Winter B. (2013). Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Lang. Dyn. Change 3 1–27.

Bergman B.DahlÖ (1994). “Ideophones in Sign Language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish sign language,” in Tense, Aspect and Action - Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, eds Bache C.Basboll H.Lindberg C. E. (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 397–422.

Corbett G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cormier K.Fenlon J. (2009). “Possession in the visual-gestural modality: how possession is expressed in British sign language,” in The Expression of Possession, ed. McGregor W. (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 389–422.

Cuxac C.Sallandre M. (2007). “Iconicity and arbitrariness in French sign language: highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity,” in Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparative Structures, Concepts, and Methodologies, eds Pizzuto E.Pietrandrea P.Simone R. (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 13–33.

Dahl O. (2004). The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 10.1075/slcs.71

de Beuzeville L.Johnston T.Schembri A. (2009). The use of space with indicating verbs in Auslan: a corpus-based investigation. Sign Lang. Linguist. 12 53–82. 10.1075/sll.12.1.03deb

De Vos C. (2012). Sign-Spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a Village Sign Language in Bali Inscribes its Signing Space. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.