publication . Article . 2017

The Environmental Impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies: Examples from Hungary

Andrea Szalavetz;
Open Access
  • Published: 01 Jun 2017 Journal: Central European Business Review, volume 6, pages 18-29 (issn: 1805-4854, eissn: 1805-4862, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: University of Economics
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate the beneficial impact of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT) on firms’ environmental performance. Drawing on interviews conducted with 16 Hungarian manufacturing subsidiaries on their experience with AMT, we find three functional areas, where industry 4.0 solutions can not only enhance operational excellence and cost-efficiency, but they can also improve eco-efficiency, but they can also improve eco-efficiency, namely in the field of quality management (through smart production control, data analytics and predictive modelling solutions); process optimization (through capacity planning and production scheduling sol...
Subjects
free text keywords: Resource efficiency, Capacity planning, Operations management, Business, Advanced manufacturing, Process management, Production control, Scheduling (production processes), Industry 4.0, Operational excellence, Quality management, greening, manufacturing subsidiaries, process upgrading, HF5001-6182
Related Organizations
24 references, page 1 of 2

Albertini, E. (2013). Does environmental management improve ?nanci al performance? A meta-analytical review. Organization & Environment, 26(4), 431-457.

Backlund, S., Thollander, P., Palm, J., & Ottosson, M. (2012). Extending the energy ePciency gap. Energy Policy, 51, 392-396. [OpenAIRE]

Behrendt, A., Müller, N., Odenwälder, P., & Schmitz, C. (2017). Industry 4.0 demysti?edlean's next level. Retrieved March 3, 2017 from http://www.mckinsey.com.

Berman, B. (2012). 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business Horizons, 55(2), 155-162.

Birkinshaw, J. (2000). Entrepreneurship in the global =rm. London: SAGE.

Brettel M., Friederichsen N., Keller M., & Rosenberg M. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering, 8(1), 37-44.

Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Re[ections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10), 1073-1083.

De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing ?rms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614-623.

Dornfeld, D. A. (2014): Moving towards green and sustainable manufacturing. International J. of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1(1), 63-66.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

Fleiter, T., Hirzel, S., & Worrell, E. (2012). The characteristics of energy-ePciency m easures-a neglected dimension. Energy Policy, 51, 502-513. [OpenAIRE]

Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573-1587. [OpenAIRE]

Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. International J. of Lean Six Sigma, 6(3), 226-248.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the ?rm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.

24 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue