publication . Article . 2015

Prevalencia de infecciones por Chlamydia trachomatis y Neisseria gonorrhoeae en adolescentes de colegios de la provincia de Sabana Centro, Cundinamarca, Colombia

María Cecilia Paredes; Yenny Gómez; Ana Marcela Torres; Marcela Fernández; María Belén Tovar;
Open Access Spanish
  • Published: 01 Sep 2015
  • Publisher: Instituto Nacional de Salud
Abstract
Introducción. Las infecciones por Chlamydia trachomatis y Neisseria gonorrhoeae son las dos infecciones bacterianas de transmisión sexual más frecuentes en el mundo, principalmente en menores de 25 años, en cuya salud sexual, reproductiva y materno-infantil producen secuelas. Objetivo. Estimar la prevalencia de las infecciones por C. trachomatis y N. gonorrhoeae entre adolescentes en colegios de la provincia de Sabana Centro, Cundinamarca, Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio de corte transversal en adolescentes de 14 a 19 años matriculados en colegios ubicados en los 11 municipios de la zona de estudio. Después de obtener el consentimiento informa...
Persistent Identifiers
Subjects
free text keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, adolescente, estudiantes, prevalencia, reacción en cadena de la polimerasa, adolescent, students, prevalence, polymerase chain reaction, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, adolescent, students, prevalence, polymerase chain reaction, lcsh:Medicine, lcsh:R, lcsh:Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine, lcsh:RC955-962, Microbiology, Zona, biology.organism_classification, biology, medicine.disease_cause, medicine, business.industry, business
Related Organizations
45 references, page 1 of 3

1. World Health Organization. Prevalence and incidence of selected sexually transmitted infections. Methods and results used by WHO to generate 2005 estimates. Fecha de consulta: 8 de diciembre de 2011. Disponible en: http://whqlibdoc.who. int/publications/2011/9789241502450_eng.pdf.

2. Bohm I, Groning A, Sommer B, Muller HW, Krawczak M, Glaubitz R. A German Chlamydia trachomatis screening program employing semi-automated real-time PCR: Results and perspectives. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:S27-32. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1386-6532(09)70298-7

3. Miller W, Ford C, Morris M, Handcock MS, Schmitz JL, Hobbs MM, et al. Prevalence of Chlamydia and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:2229-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/ jama.291.18.2229

4. Franceschi S, Smith JS, van Den Brule A, Herrero R, Arslan A, Anh PT, et al. Cervical infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women from ten areas in four continents. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:563-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.olq.0000258417.66619.0e

5. Adams EJ, Charlett A, Edmunds WJ, Hughes G. Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80:354-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2003.005454

6. Marrazo JM, Whittington WL, Celum CL, Handsfield HH, Clark A, Cles L, et al. Urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:219-25.

7. Emans J. Pediatric and adolescent gynecology: Sexually transmitted infections. 6th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 565-614.

8. Mangione-Smith R, O'Leary J, McGlynn E. Health and cost-benefits of Chlamydia screening in young women. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:309-16.

9. Kahn RH, Mosure DJ, Blank S, Kent CK, Chow JM, Boudov MR, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae prevalence and coinfection in adolescents entering selected US juvenile detention centers, 1997- 2002. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:255-9. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1097/01.olq.0000158496.00315.04

10. Smith JS, Bosetti C, Muñoz N, Herrero R, Bosch FX, Eluf-Neto J, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and invasive cervical cancer: A pooled analysis of the IARC multicentric case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:431-9. http://dx. doi.org/1o.1002/ijc.20257

11. Harindra V, Underhill G, Tobin JM. Screening for genital Chlamydia infection: DNA amplification techniques should be the test of choice. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:723-6. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1258/09564620360719732

12. Tabrizi SN, Chen S, Cohenford MA, Lentrichia BB, Coffman E, Shultz T, et al. Evaluation of real time polymerase chain reaction assays for confirmation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical samples tested positive in the Roche cobas amplicor assay. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80:68-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2003.006239

13. Gaydos CA, Kent CK, Rietmeijer CA, Willard NJ, Marrazzo JM, Chapin JB, et al. Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae among men screened for Chlamydia trachomatis in four United States cities, 1999-2003. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:314-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01. olq.0000194572.51186.96

14. Dicker LW, Mosure DJ, Berman SM, Levine WC. Gonorrhea prevalence and coinfection with Chlamydia in women in the United States, 2000. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:472-5.

15. Schachter J, Hook EW, Martin DH, Willis D, Fine P, Fuller D, et al. Confirming positive results of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: All NAATs are not created equal. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1372-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.3.1372- 1373.2005

45 references, page 1 of 3
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue