publication . Article . 2014

Risk assessment of influence factors on occupational hearing loss in noise – exposed workers in typical metal industry

Farhadian Maryam; Aliabadi Mohsen; Shahidi Reza;
Open Access Persian
  • Published: 01 Nov 2014 Journal: Muhandisī-i bihdāsht-i ḥirfah/ī (issn: 2383-3378, eissn: 2383-3378, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Background & Objectives : Worker exposure conditions such as noise level, exposure duration, use of hearing protection devices and health behaviors are commonly related to noise induced hearing loss. The objective of this study was risk assessment of influence factors on occupational hearing loss in noise exposed workers in typical noisy process . Methods : Information about occupational exposure of seventy workers employed in a noisy press workshop was gathered using the standard questionnaire. Audiometery test was performed using the screening audiometer (Model-Mevox). Afterward, the collected data was analyzed by using the Cox model in SPSS software. Results ...
Medical Subject Headings: otorhinolaryngologic diseases
free text keywords: Cox model, Noise induced hearing loss, Hearing conservation program, Industrial medicine. Industrial hygiene, RC963-969
Download from

programs be accepted as a US national standard? J Am Acad Audiol. 1995; 6:302-310. 12. Simpson T, Amos N, Rintelmann W. Effects of pre-existing hearing loss on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness: Follow up investigations.J Am Acad Audiol. 1998; 9:112-120. 13. Adera T, amir C, anderson L. Time trends analysis of hearing loss : an alternative approach to evaluating hearing loss prevention programs , AIHA journal. 2004; 61:161-165. 14. Davies H, Marion S, Teschke K. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noiseinduced hearing loss in Canadian workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2008; 51:923-931. 15. ANSI. Criteria for permissible ambient noise during audiometric testing. American National Standards Institute, New York (ANSIS3.1- 1999), New York; 1999. 16. ANSI. Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry (ANSI S3.21-2004), New York; 2004. 17. American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO).

Guide for the evaluation of hearing handicap. J Am Med Assoc 1974; 241(19):2055-2059. 18. WHO. Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment. Thirty-ninth world health assembly.

World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 1986. 19. ISO 9612. Acoustics - Determination of occupational noise exposure Engineering method, Second Edition; 2009. 20. Klein J P, Melvin L. Survival Analysis Techniques for Cencored and Truncated Data.

Edition S, editor: Springer Publication; 2003. 21. ACGIH. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists , Cincinati: 2011. 22. Palmer KT, Griffin MJ, Syddall HE, Coggon D: Cigarette smoking, occupational exposure to noise, and self reported hearing difficulties Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2004,61:340-344. 23. Mizoue T, Miyamoto T, Shimizu T. Combined effect of smoking and occupational exposure to noise on hearing loss in steel factory workers. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60:56-9. 24. Nakanishi N, Okamoto M, Nakamura K, Suzuki K, Tatara K. Cigarette smoking and risk for hearing impairment a longitudinal study in Japanese male office workers: a longitudinal study in Japanese male office workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2000; 42:10- 45. 25. Ahmed HO, Dennis JH, Badran O, Ismail M.Occupational Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss of Workers in Two Plants in Eastern Saudi Arabia. Ann.

occup. Hyg. 2001; 45( 5): 371-380. 26. Morata TC, Fiorini AC, Fischer F M, Krieg EF. Factors affecting the use of hearing protectors in a population of printing workers. Noise Health. 2001; 4 (13):25-32. 27. Byrne DC, Davis RR, Shaw PB, Specht BM.

Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.Noise Health 2011;13:86-92. 28. Nelisse H, Gaudreau M, Boutin J, Voix J, Laville F. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations. Ann Occup Hyg .

2012;56(2):221-32. 29. NIOSH. Criteria for a Recommended Standard: occupational noise exposure publication No. 98- 126;1998. 30. European Committee for Standardization (CEN).

Hearing protectors-recommendations for selection, use, care and maintenance-guide document (Standard No. EN 458:2004). Brussels, Belgium: CEN; 2004. 31. Solano JC, Gracia AI, Felipe AI, Calvo ER, Prados AP. Cox regression model of hearing loss in workers exposed to noise and metalworking fluids or welding fumes. An Sist Sanit Navar.2010;33(1):11- 21. 32. Curhan SG, Eavey R, Shargorodsky J, Curhan GC. Prospective study of alcohol use and hearing loss in men. Ear Hear. 2011;32(1):46-52.

1* . (Corresponding author) Department of Biostatistics, School of public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran. Email: 2. Department of Occupational Health, School of public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran. 3. Department of Occupational Health, School of public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran.

Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue