publication . Article . 2017

The Development of Assistive Systems to Support Older People: Issues that Affect Success in Practice

Jean Hallewell Haslwanter; Geraldine Fitzpatrick;
Open Access English
  • Published: 22 Dec 2017 Journal: Technologies (issn: 2227-7080, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: MDPI AG
Due to an aging population in Europe, the development of Ambient Assisted Living technologies (AAL) is increasingly the target of research financing. These technologies promise to enable older people to remain in their own homes longer, something many people report wanting and which may also reduce the costs of care. To date however there are few systems on the market. Other studies have tried to understand this by looking at user acceptance. However, by looking only at the user acceptance, we may miss important aspects to explain why systems went wrong in the first place, since decisions made during the development may affect the success later. To address this,...
free text keywords: older people, ambient assisted living, human-centered computing, managing software development, Technology, T, Population ageing, Psychology, Qualitative research, Public relations, business.industry, business
48 references, page 1 of 4

1. European Commission. The Demographic Future of Europe-From Challenge to Opportunity; European Communities: Luxembourg, 2006; ISBN 92-79-02092-7.

2. European Commission. 2009 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008-2060); Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 2009; ISBN 978-92-79-11363-9.

3. Busquin, P.; Aarts, E.; Dózsa, C.; Mollenkopf, H.; Uusikylä, P.; Sharpe, M. Final Evaluation of the Ambient Assisted Living Joint Program; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2013; ISBN 978-92-79-34550-0.

4. Bano, M.; Zowghi, D. User Involvement in Software Development and System Success: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Porto de Galinhas, Brazil, 14-16 April 2013; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 125-130. [OpenAIRE]

5. Berntsson-Svensson, R.; Aurum, A. Successful software project and products: An empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21-22 September 2006; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 144-153. [OpenAIRE]

6. Turner, K.J.; McGee-Lennon, M.R. Advances in telecare over the past 10 years. Smart Homecare Technol. TeleHealth 2013, 1, 21-34. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]

7. Fischinger, D.; Einramhof, P.; Wohlkinger, W.; Papoutsakis, K.; Mayer, P.; Panek, P.; Koertner, T.; Hofmann, S.; Argyros, A.; Vincze, M.; et al. Hobbit-The Mutual Care Robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2013), Tokyo, Japan, 3-7 November 2013; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1-6.

8. Gregor, P.; Newell, A.F. Designing for dynamic diversity: Making accessible interfaces for older people. In Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, WUAUC '01, Alcácer do Sal, Portugal, 22-25 May 2001; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 90-92.

9. Svagård, I.S.; Boysen, E.S. Electronic Medication Dispensers Finding the Right Users. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference, ICCHP 2016, Linz, Austria, 13-15 July 2016; Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; Part I, pp. 281-284. [OpenAIRE]

10. Barlow, J.; Singh, D.; Bayer, S.; Curry, R. A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J. Telemed. Telecare 2007, 13, 172-179. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11. Lee, M.L.; Dey, A.K. Sensor-based observations of daily living for aging in place. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2015, 19, 27-43. [CrossRef]

12. Sanders, C.; Rogers, A.; Bowen, R.; Bower, P.; Hirani, S.; Cartwright, M.; Fitzpatrick, R.; Knapp, M.; Barlow, J.; Hendy, J.; et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: A qualitative study. BMC. Health Serv. Res. 2012, 12, 220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13. Yusif, S.; Soar, J.; Hafeez-Baig, A. Older people, assistive technologies and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2016, 94, 112-116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [OpenAIRE]

14. Mort, M.; Roberts, C.; Callen, B. Ageing with telecare: Care or coercion in austerity? Sociol. Health Illn. 2012, 35, 799-812. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [OpenAIRE]

15. Hassard, S.T.; Blandford, A.; Cox, A.L. Analogies in Design Decision-making. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology, Cambridge, UK, 1-5 September 2009; BCS: Swindon, UK, 2009; pp. 140-148.

48 references, page 1 of 4
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue