Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Мать и дитя в Кузбас...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

CYTOLOGICAL SCREENING FOR CERVICAL CANCER DIAGNOSING

CYTOLOGICAL SCREENING FOR CERVICAL CANCER DIAGNOSING

Abstract

Objective – to study the advantages of liquid-based cytology in comparison with Pap test in early diagnosis of cervical cancer. Materials and methods. The clinical records of 145 women of reproductive age were analysed. The women had applied to antenatal clinic in Clinical Policlinic N 20 were studied by clinical, laboratory, statistical methods. All women underwent cytological screening both with a technology such as the PAP test and a liquid-based one. Results. While estimating sensitivity, specificity and prognostic value of the cytological screening, the following findings were received: The sensitivity of liquid-based cytology was 70.0 % while that of the Pap test – 60.0 %. The specificity of liquid-based cytology (86.0 %) was lower than that of the PAP test (88.0 %). The prognostic value of the positive result of the liquid-based cytology test (75.0 %) was identical to the PAP test (87.0 %) prognostic value. However, the prognostic value of the negative result of the liquid-based cytology test (83.0 %) was much higher than that of the PAP test (50.0 %). Conclusion: We identified that both screenings have similar prediction value for disease probability. However liquid-based cytology test allows reducing the number of negative results. Currently a wide application of more efficient methods – detection of Human Papilloma Virus DNA of high oncogenic risk – is required for the well-arranged screening program.

Keywords

цитологический скрининг путем пап- теста и жидкостный, RG1-991, Gynecology and obstetrics, женщины, Pediatrics, RJ1-570

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research