Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Medienimpulsearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Medienimpulse
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

KI oder nicht KI?

Authors: Karin Tengler; Gerhard Brandhofer;

KI oder nicht KI?

Abstract

Generative künstliche Intelligenz (KI) ist in der Hochschulbildung angekommen und dient zunehmend der Nutzung im wissenschaftlichen Schreibprozess. Dieser Beitrag präsentiert eine Studie, die den Unterschied KI-generierter Texte versus von Lehramtsstudierenden (N=39) generierter Texte und den Nutzen generativer KI beim (wissenschaftlichen) Schreibprozess in der Hochschullehre untersucht. Die Ergebnisse der kriteriengeleiteten Bewertung zeigen, dass KI-Texte vor allem in den Bereichen des logischen Aufbaus und Sprachbeherrschung signifikant besser abschneiden. Außerdem wird vom Großteil der Studierenden generative KI nutzbringend im Schreibprozesses wahrgenommen. Die Erkenntnisse lassen das Potenzial von KI als Werkzeug in der Hochschullehre erkennen, werfen jedoch auch Fragen hinsichtlich der akademischen Integrität und kritischem Denken auf.

Keywords

Schreibprozess, Künstliche Intelligenz, Communication. Mass media, Hochschullehre, P87-96, Generative KI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal
Related to Research communities