Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Electronic archive U...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Русская классика в парадоксальной критической рефлексии К. Леонтьева

Authors: Rakovskaya, N. M.;

Русская классика в парадоксальной критической рефлексии К. Леонтьева

Abstract

In a modern humanitarian discourse, interpretations and reception of the critical text are updated. In this aspect works of scientists V. Krylova, R. Gromyak, M. Lanovik, N. Astrakhan, etc. are interesting. In this article K. Leontyev's judgments about Russian literature of the 19th century are given. In the center of judgments, there are philosophical, esthetic and psycho mental aspects connecting in a whole are accented. Literary articles of critic are built on oppositions: harmony - disharmony, fine - ugly, didactic - esthetic. In this regard, A. Pushkin's reception representing the ideal essence granted by God and creative intuition for K. Leontyev is learning. K. Leontyev's polemic with F. Dostoyevsky in which the question is about A. Pushkin's role in Christian culture is considered. Ideas of critic about modern to him realistic literature representing from his point of view no beautiful but, “ordinary of the trite world” are updated. Such paradoxical point of view is caused by the concept of an estheticism of the critic, his rejection of the egalitarian world. In the article is noted that the subject of art and philosophical searches of K. Leontyev is the poetic “scenic beauty of terrestrial life” which is grasping the ratio of the internal law of life with empirical. Creative process in K. Leontyev's concept is an aspiration to the embodiment in the art world of the writer only the esthetic idea about beauty. Possessing a poetic vision, K. Leontyev draws special attention to text's poetics, namely: the points of view in the text, a role of the author, function of the story-teller and text symbolic. The critic learns how and what way the esthetic effect of the text is realized in the communicative sphere: the text - the author - the reader. It is obvious that K. Leontyev's monitoring give the chance to call him the forerunner of the Russian modernism.

В современном гуманитарном дискурсе актуализируются интерпретации и рецепция критического текста. В этом плане интерес представляют работы ученых В. Крылова, Р. Громяка, М. Лановик, Н. Астрахан и др. В данной статье акцентируются суждения К. Леонтьева о русской литературе XIX века, в центре которых философские, эстетические и психоментальные аспекты соединяются в единое целое. Литературные статьи критика построены на оппозициях: гармония - дисгармония, прекрасное - безобразное, дидактическое - эстетическое. В связи с этим исследуется, в частности, рецепция А. Пушкина, представляющая для К. Леонтьева идеальную сущность, даруемую Богом и творческой интуицией. Рассматривается полемика К. Леонтьева с Ф. Достоевским, в которой речь идет о роли А. Пушкина в христианской культуре. Актуализируются идеи критика о современной ему реалистической литературе, представляющей с точки зрения критика не прекрасное, а «обыденное пошлого мира». Такая парадоксальная точка зрения обусловлена концепцией эстетизма критика, его неприятием эгалитарного мира. В статье указывается, что предметом художественных и философских исканий К. Леонтьева является поэтическая «живописность земного бытия», постигаемая в соотношении внутреннего закона бытия с эмпирическим. Творческий процесс в концепции К. Леонтьева это стремление к воплощению в художественном мире писателя исключительно эстетической идеи о красоте. Обладая поэтическим видением, К. Леонтьев обращает особое внимание на поэтику текста, а именно: точки зрения в тексте, роль автора, функции рассказчика и повествователя, символику текста. Критик исследует, как и каким образом создается эстетический эффект текста, реализуемый в коммуникативной сфере: текст - автор - читатель. Очевидно, что наблюдения К. Леонтьева дают возможность назвать его предтечей русского модернизма.

Related Organizations
Keywords

ЛИТЕРАТУРНАЯ КРИТИКА, ДОСТОЕВСКИЙ ФЕДОР МИХАЙЛОВИЧ (1821-1881), CRITICAL REFLECTION, ПУШКИН АЛЕКСАНДР СЕРГЕЕВИЧ (1799-1837), LITERARY CRITICISM, ЛИТЕРАТУРНЫЕ ЖАНРЫ, РУССКИЕ ПИСАТЕЛИ, ЛИТЕРАТУРНОЕ ТВОРЧЕСТВО, AESTHETICISM, РУССКАЯ ЛИТЕРАТУРА XIX В., ПАРАДОКСАЛЬНОСТЬ, ЛИТЕРАТУРОВЕДЕНИЕ, ЛЕОНТЬЕВ КОНСТАНТИН НИКОЛАЕВИЧ, ЭСТЕТИЗМ, ЛИТЕРАТУРНЫЕ КРИТИКИ, КРИТИЧЕСКАЯ РЕФЛЕКСИЯ, PARADOXICALITY

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green