Linking theory to practice in learning technology research

Article English OPEN
Cathy Gunn ; Caroline Steel (2012)
  • Publisher: Association for Learning Technology
  • Journal: Research in Learning Technology (issn: 2156-7069, eissn: 2156-7077)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16148
  • Subject: research methodology; educational design research; educational theory; evaluation | educational design research | evaluation | Education | educational theory | L | research methodology

We present a case to reposition theory so that it plays a pivotal role in learning technology research and helps to build an ecology of learning. To support the case, we present a critique of current practice based on a review of articles published in two leading international journals from 2005 to 2010. Our study reveals that theory features only incidentally or not at all in many cases. We propose theory development as a unifying theme for learning technology research study design and reporting. The use of learning design as a strategy to develop and test theories in practice is integral to our argument. We conclude by supporting other researchers who recommend educational design research as a theory focused methodology to move the field forward in productive and consistent ways. The challenge of changing common practice will be involved. However, the potential to raise the profile of learning technology research and improve educational outcomes justifies the effort required.Keywords: research methodology; educational design research; educational theory; evaluation(Published: 15 March 2012)Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2012, 20: 16148 - DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16148
  • References (30)
    30 references, page 1 of 3

    Association of Learning Technology. (2010) Technology in Learning: A Response to Some Questions From the Department of Business Innovation and Skills, Association of Learning Technology, Oxford.

    Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003) 'The role of design in research: the integrative learning design framework', Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 21 24.

    Barab, S. & Kirshner, D. (2001) 'Rethinking methodology in the learning sciences', The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1 2, pp. 5 15.

    Barab, S. & Squire, K. (2004) 'Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground', The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1 14.

    Bloch, M. (2004) 'A discourse that disciplines, governs and regulates: the national research council's report on scientific research in education', Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 96 110.

    Brown, A. (1992) 'Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings', Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 141 178.

    Cobb, P. (2001) 'Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional contexts', in Cognition and Instruction: 25 Years of Progress, eds. S. Carver and D. Klahr, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 455 478.

    Collins, A., Joseph, D. & Beilaczyc, K. (2004) 'Design research: theoretical and methodological issues', The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15 42.

    Edelson, D. C. (2002) 'Design research: what we learn when we engage in design', The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 105 121.

    Edelson, D. C. (2006) 'Balancing innovation and risk: assessing design research proposals', in Educational Design Research, eds. J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney and N. Nieveen, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 100 106.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark