What is infidelity? Perceptions based on biological sex and personality

Article English OPEN
Nagurney, Alexander ; Thornton, (2011)
  • Publisher: Dove Press
  • Journal: Psychology Research and Behavior Management, volume 4, pages 51-58 (issn: 1179-1578, eissn: 1179-1578)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3218781, doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S16876
  • Subject: Industrial psychology | questionnaire | Psychology | agency | Psychology Research and Behavior Management | HF5548.7-5548.85 | communion | BF1-990 | infidelity | Original Research | relationship

Victoria Thornton, Alexander NagurneyTexas State University – San Marcos, San Marcos, Texas, USAAbstract: The study examines perceptions of infidelity, paying particular attention to how these perceptions differ based on biological sex and personality traits, ... View more
  • References (21)
    21 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Chuick C. Gender and Infidelity: a Study of the Relationship Between Conformity to Masculine Norms and Extrarelational Involvement [dissertation]. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa; 2009.

    2. Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1948.

    3. Whitty MT, Quigley L. Emotional and sexual infidelity offline and in cyberspace. J Marital Fam Ther. 2008;34(4):461-468.

    4. Blow AJ, Hartnett K. Inf idelity in committed relationships. II: A substantive review. J Marital Fam Ther. 2005;31(2):217-233.

    5. Miller SL, Maner JK. Sex differences in response to sexual versus emotional infidelity: the moderating role of individual differences. Pers Indiv Differ. 2009;46(3):287-291.

    6. Shackelford TK, Buss DM. Betrayal in mateships, friendships, and coalitions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996;22:1151-1164.

    7. HelgesonVS. Relation of agency and communion to well-being: evidence and potential explanations. Psychol Bull. 1994;116:412-428.

    8. Bakan D. The Duality of Human Existence. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1966.

    9. Helgeson VS, Fritz HL. Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: distinctions from agency and communion. J Res Pers. 1999;33:131-158.

    10. Spence JT, Helmreich RL. The many faces of androgyny: A reply to Locksley and Colten. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979;37:1032-1046.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark