UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support

Article English OPEN
Whitmarsh, Lorraine ; Nash, Nick ; Upham, Paul ; Lloyd, Alyson ; Verdon, James P. ; Kendall, J.-Michael (2015)
  • Publisher: Elsevier BV
  • Journal: Applied Energy, volume 160, pages 419-430 (issn: 0306-2619)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.004
  • Subject: Hydraulic fracturing | Shale gas | Public | Energy(all) | Attitudes | Risk perceptions | Communication | Civil and Structural Engineering

<p>There is growing recognition of the need to understand public attitudes to energy sources, such as shale gas, and to feed these into decision-making. This study represents the first detailed UK experimental survey of public perceptions of shale gas fracking, including analysis of the effects of different messages and the relative influence of different audience, message and contextual factors on support and risk perceptions in respect of shale gas fracking. Using an online survey (N = 1457) of the UK public, we find considerable ambivalence about shale gas, but also greater awareness of potential risks than benefits. Prior knowledge is associated with more favourable attitudes, although demographics, political affiliation and environmental values are strongest influences on perceptions. When provided with environmental or economic information about shale gas, participants became more positive - irrespective of their prior values or whether information is framed in terms of losses or gains. As expected, prior attitudes predict how information is received, with more attitude change amongst the most ambivalent respondents. We conclude that additional information about shale gas is more likely to be effective changing attitudes if focussed on this 'undecided' group. Studies of this type are important for policy makers and industry alike.</p>
  • References (51)
    51 references, page 1 of 6

    [1] DECC. Delivering UK energy investment; 2014b. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331071/DECC_ Energy_Investment_Report.pdf [accessed 11.01.15].

    [2] DECC. Gas generation strategy. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change; 2012. file/65654/7165-gas-generation-strategy.pdf [accessed 15.12.14].

    [3] Rathbone P, Bass R. Unconventional gas: The potential impact on UK gas prices. London: Navigant Consulting (Europe) Ltd.; 2012.

    [4] Taylor C, Lewis D. Getting shale gas working. In: Infrastructure for business series 6. London: Institute of Directors; 2013.

    [5] Bradshaw M, Bridge G, Bouzarovski S, Watson J, Dutton J. The UK's global gas challenge - research report. London: UKERC; 2014.

    [6] Friends of the earth. Shale gas: not all it's fracked up to be. Briefing note; November 2013. [accessed 15.12.14].

    [7] Royal Society. Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing. London: The Royal Society; 2012.

    [8] Kibble A, Cabianca T, Daraktchieva Z, Gooding T, Smithard J, Kowalczyk G, et al. Review of the potential public health impacts of exposures to chemical and radioactive pollutants as a result of the shale gas extraction process. Publ Health Engl PHE-CRCE-009 2012.

    [9] IEA. Golden rules for a golden age of gas: WEO special report. International Energy Agency; 2012. weowebsite/2012/goldenrules/WEO2012_GoldenRulesReport.pdf [accessed 15.12.14].

    [10] Harvey F. Protesters attempt to set up coalition against fracking. The Guardian, 16th March; 2012. protesters-coalition-against-fracking [accessed 11.01.15].

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 89
Share - Bookmark