Electronic structure of graphene beyond the linear dispersion regime

Article, Preprint English OPEN
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.155432
  • Subject: Atomic, molecular and chemical physics | Condensed Matter - Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics | Nanoscience & Materials | graphene

PUBLISHED Among the many interesting features displayed by graphene, one of the most attractive is the simplicity with which its electronic structure can be described. The study of its physical properties is significantly simplified by the linear dispersion relation of electrons in a narrow range around the Fermi level. Unfortunately, the mathematical simplicity of graphene electrons is limited only to this narrow energy region and is not very practical when dealing with problems that involve energies outside the linear dispersion part of the spectrum. In this communication we remedy this limitation by deriving a set of closed-form analytical expressions for the real-space single-electron Green function of graphene which is valid across a large fraction of the energy spectrum. By extending to a wider energy range the simplicity with which graphene electrons are described, it is now possible to derive more mathematically transparent and insightful expressions for a number of physical properties that involve higher energy scales. The power of this new formalism is illustrated in the case of the magnetic (RKKY) interaction in graphene.
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    [1] A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Materials, 6, 183 (2007)

    [2] A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov and A. K. Geim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

    [3] The electronic hopping parameter of graphene is commonly quoted in the literature as approximately t = −2.7eV . Within this work, the energy, E, is expressed in units of |t|. However, whenever t appears in an expression it is important that a negative quantity is used. It is common practice to set t = 1.0 when dealing with expressions similar to Eqs. (12) and (18). However due to the sign choices implicit in the calculation of these quantities this may lead to an erroneous result. If renormalising t, a negative value will return the correct Green function.

    [4] A. T. Costa, D. F. Kirwan and M. S. Ferreira, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085402 (2005)

    [5] M. L. Boas, Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, Wiley (1983)

    [6] A. A. Abrikosov, Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals, North Holland (1988)

    [7] Accounting for both stationary solutions improve the result only for energies very near the van Hove singularities at E = ±t. Other than that, the excluding conditions at Eq.(6) are sufficient.

    [8] S. Saremi, Phys. Rev. B 76, 184430 (2007)

    [9] L. Brey, H. A. Fertig and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 116802 (2007)

    [10] M. A. H. Vozmediano, M. P. Lopez-Sancho, T. Stauber and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. B 72, 155121 (2005)

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark