Green Supply Chain Collaboration for Fashionable Consumer Electronics Products under Third-Party Power Intervention—A Resource Dependence Perspective

Article, Other literature type OPEN
Jiuh-Biing Sheu (2014)
  • Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
  • Journal: Sustainability, volume 6, issue 5 5, pages 1-44 (issn: 2071-1050)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.3390/su6052832
  • Subject: TD194-195 | Renewable energy sources | resource dependence | green supply chain performance | power restructuring | TJ807-830 | power restructuring; resource dependence; collaborative relationships; green supply chain performance; resource dependence theory | collaborative relationships | GE1-350 | Environmental sciences | Environmental effects of industries and plants | resource dependence theory
    • jel: jel:Q2 | jel:Q3 | jel:Q0 | jel:Q | jel:Q5 | jel:Q56 | jel:O13

Under third-party power intervention (TPPI), which increases uncertainty in task environments, complex channel power interplays and restructuring are indispensable among green supply chain members as they move toward sustainable collaborative relationships for increased viability and competitive advantage. From the resource dependence perspective, this work presents a novel conceptual model to investigate the influence of political and social power on channel power restructuring and induced green supply chain collaboration in brander-retailer bidirectional green supply chains of fashionable consumer electronics products (FCEPs). An FCEP refers to the consumer electronics product (e.g., personal computers, mobile phones, computer notebooks, and game consoles) with the features of a well-known brand associated, a short product lifecycle, timely and fashionable design fit for market trends, and quick responsiveness to the variations of market demands. The proposed model is tested empirically using questionnaire data obtained from retailers in the FCEP brander-retailer distribution channels. Analytical results reveal that as an extension of political and social power, TPPI positively affects the reciprocal interdependence of dyadic members and reduces power asymmetry, thereby enhancing the collaborative relationship of dyadic members and leading to improved green supply chain performance. Therein, reciprocal interdependence underlying collaborative relationship is the key to reducing the external environmental uncertainties in the TPPI context.
  • References (133)
    133 references, page 1 of 14

    1. Bruce, M.; Daly, L.; Towers, N. Lean or agile: A solution of supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2004, 24, 151-170.

    2. Barnes, L.; Lea-Greenwood, G. Fast fashioning the supply chain: Shaping the research agenda. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2006, 10, 259-271.

    3. MacCarthy, B.L.; Jayarathne, P.G.S.A. Fast fashion: Achieving global quick response (GQR) in the internationally dispersed clothing industry. In Innovative Quick Response Programs in Logistics and Supply Chain Management, International Handbooks on Information Systems; Cheng, T.C., Choi, T.-M., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2010; pp. 37-60.

    4. Turker, D.; Altuntas, C. Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry: An analysis of corporate reports. Eur. Manag. J. 2014. Available online: 10.1016/j.emj.2014.02.001 (accessed on 1 April 2014).

    5. Ho, J.; Kretz, C. Green electronics take root. Taipei Times, 20 June 2005.

    6. Clean Production Action. Establishing effective extended producer responsibility legislation: A checklist for decision-makers, zero waste advocates and waste managers. Available online: (accessed on 1 April 2014).

    7. Stevels, A.; Huisman, J. An industry vision on the implementation of WEEE and RoHS. WEEE-forum, European Association of Electrical and Electronic Waste Take Back Systems. Available online: (accessed on 1 April 2014).

    8. ETC. Electronics Take-Back Coalition. Computer takeback. Available online: (accessed on 15 January 2010).

    9. Cincom, Cincom Systems. The high costs of non-compliance for manufacturers. White Paper-Cincom in-depth analysis and review. Available online: http://whitepapers. (accessed on 1 April 2014).

    10. Apple Inc. Apple Recycling Programs. Available online: (accessed on 1 April 2014).

  • Similar Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark