publication . Conference object . Preprint . 2012

Should Terminology Principles be re-examined?

Roche, Christophe;
Open Access English
  • Published: 19 Jun 2012
  • Publisher: HAL CCSD
Abstract
International audience; Operationalization of terminology for IT applications has revived the Wüsterian approach. The conceptual dimension once more prevails after taking back seat to specialised lexicography. This is demonstrated by the emergence of ontology in terminology. While the Terminology Principles as defined in Felber's manual and the ISO standards remain at the core of traditional terminology , their computational implementation raises some issues. In this article, while reiterating their importance, we will be re-examining these Principles from a dual perspective: that of logic in the mathematical sense of the term and that of epistemology as in the ...
Subjects
free text keywords: ISO standards, Terminology principles, [SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics, [INFO.INFO-AI]Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI], Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Terminology, ISO 704, Knowledge theory, Ontoterminology 1 Introduction, Logic, ISO 1087-1, Ontology
40 references, page 1 of 3

1. Alexeeva, L.M.: “Interaction between Terminology and Philosophy. Theoretical Foundations of Terminology Comparison between Eastern Europe and Western Countries”. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag (2006).

2. Arnauld A., Nicole P.: “Logic or the Art of Thinking”. Translated by Jill Vance Buroker. Cambridge University Press (1996)

3. Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D., Nardi D. and Patel-Schneider P.: “The Description Logic Handbook”. Cambridge University Press (2003)

4. Brachman R.J., Levesque H.J.: “Readings in Knowledge Representation”. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. (1985)

5. Budin, G.: “A critical evaluation of the state-of-the-art of Terminology Theory”. ITTF Journal, 12. Vienna. TermNet (2001)

6. Cabré T.: “Theories in terminology”. Terminology 9:2. pp. 163-199 (2003)

7. Campenhoudt M.: “Que nous reste-t-il d'Eugen Wüster ?”. Colloque international Eugen Wüster et la terminologie de l'Ecole de Vienne. Paris, 3-4 février (2006).

8. Costa R.: “Plurality of Theoretical Approaches to Terminology”. Modern Approaches to Terminological Theories and Applications. Heribert Picht [ed.]. Serie: Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication. Vol.36. Berlin-Bern: Peter Lang Verlag (2006)

9. Depecker L., Roche C.: “Entre idée et concept : vers l'ontologie”. Revue Langages n°168, décembre 2007, pp. 106-114 (Éditions Larousse) (2007)

10. Felber, H.: “Terminology Manual”. Unesco (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization) - Infoterm (International Information Centre for Terminology) (1984)

11. Frege G.: “Écrits logiques et philosophiques”. Éditions du Seuil. Paris.

12. Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho. O., Fernandez-Lopez, M.: “Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web”. Asuncion Gomez-Perez, Oscar Corcho, Mariano Fernandez-Lopez, Springer (2004)

13. Gruber, T.: “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”. Knowledge Systems Laboratory September 1992. Technical Report KSL 92-71. Revised April 1993. Appeared in Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220 (1993)

14. Guarino, N., Carrara, M., and Giaretta, P.: “An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories”. In J. Doyle, E. Sandewall and P. Torasso (eds.). Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (KR94). Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA: 270-280 (1994)

15. Humbley J.: “La réception de l'oeuvre d'Eugen Wüster dans les pays de langue française”. Cahier du C.I.E.L. pp 33-51(2004) [OpenAIRE]

40 references, page 1 of 3
Abstract
International audience; Operationalization of terminology for IT applications has revived the Wüsterian approach. The conceptual dimension once more prevails after taking back seat to specialised lexicography. This is demonstrated by the emergence of ontology in terminology. While the Terminology Principles as defined in Felber's manual and the ISO standards remain at the core of traditional terminology , their computational implementation raises some issues. In this article, while reiterating their importance, we will be re-examining these Principles from a dual perspective: that of logic in the mathematical sense of the term and that of epistemology as in the ...
Subjects
free text keywords: ISO standards, Terminology principles, [SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics, [INFO.INFO-AI]Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI], Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Terminology, ISO 704, Knowledge theory, Ontoterminology 1 Introduction, Logic, ISO 1087-1, Ontology
40 references, page 1 of 3

1. Alexeeva, L.M.: “Interaction between Terminology and Philosophy. Theoretical Foundations of Terminology Comparison between Eastern Europe and Western Countries”. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag (2006).

2. Arnauld A., Nicole P.: “Logic or the Art of Thinking”. Translated by Jill Vance Buroker. Cambridge University Press (1996)

3. Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D., Nardi D. and Patel-Schneider P.: “The Description Logic Handbook”. Cambridge University Press (2003)

4. Brachman R.J., Levesque H.J.: “Readings in Knowledge Representation”. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. (1985)

5. Budin, G.: “A critical evaluation of the state-of-the-art of Terminology Theory”. ITTF Journal, 12. Vienna. TermNet (2001)

6. Cabré T.: “Theories in terminology”. Terminology 9:2. pp. 163-199 (2003)

7. Campenhoudt M.: “Que nous reste-t-il d'Eugen Wüster ?”. Colloque international Eugen Wüster et la terminologie de l'Ecole de Vienne. Paris, 3-4 février (2006).

8. Costa R.: “Plurality of Theoretical Approaches to Terminology”. Modern Approaches to Terminological Theories and Applications. Heribert Picht [ed.]. Serie: Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication. Vol.36. Berlin-Bern: Peter Lang Verlag (2006)

9. Depecker L., Roche C.: “Entre idée et concept : vers l'ontologie”. Revue Langages n°168, décembre 2007, pp. 106-114 (Éditions Larousse) (2007)

10. Felber, H.: “Terminology Manual”. Unesco (United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization) - Infoterm (International Information Centre for Terminology) (1984)

11. Frege G.: “Écrits logiques et philosophiques”. Éditions du Seuil. Paris.

12. Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho. O., Fernandez-Lopez, M.: “Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web”. Asuncion Gomez-Perez, Oscar Corcho, Mariano Fernandez-Lopez, Springer (2004)

13. Gruber, T.: “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”. Knowledge Systems Laboratory September 1992. Technical Report KSL 92-71. Revised April 1993. Appeared in Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220 (1993)

14. Guarino, N., Carrara, M., and Giaretta, P.: “An Ontology of Meta-Level Categories”. In J. Doyle, E. Sandewall and P. Torasso (eds.). Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (KR94). Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA: 270-280 (1994)

15. Humbley J.: “La réception de l'oeuvre d'Eugen Wüster dans les pays de langue française”. Cahier du C.I.E.L. pp 33-51(2004) [OpenAIRE]

40 references, page 1 of 3
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Conference object . Preprint . 2012

Should Terminology Principles be re-examined?

Roche, Christophe;