Earthquake Culture: A Significant Element in Earthquake Disaster Risk Assessment and Earthquake Disaster Risk Management

Part of book or chapter of book English OPEN
Ibrion, Mihaela (2018)

This book chapter brings to attention the dramatic impact of large earthquake disasters on local communities and society and highlights the necessity of building and enhancing the earthquake culture. Iran was considered as a research case study and fifteen large earthquake disasters in Iran were investigated and analyzed over more than a century-time period. It was found that the earthquake culture in Iran was and is still conditioned by many factors or parameters which are not integrated and do not work harmoniously towards building and sustaining an earthquake culture in Iran. A historical possibility of an earthquake culture in Iran was mainly severed by culture, especially beliefs, strong geopolitics in Iran and in Middle East, a complex and dynamic political landscape in Iran, foreign invasions and wars. However, there is a great potential in Iran for the earthquake culture to be built and developed. The earthquake culture is recommended to be integrated within earthquake disaster risk assessment and earthquake disasters risk management studies which are performed and carried out in Iran and other countries at seismic risk. The contribution of this book chapter is towards the earthquake disasters studies and policies for the countries at earthquake risk. Published: February 28, 2018 under CC BY 3.0 license. © The Author(s).
  • References (44)
    44 references, page 1 of 5

    [4] Ibrion M, Mokhtari M, Nadim F. Earthquake disaster risk reduction in Iran: Lessons and “Lessons Learned” from three large earthquake disasters; Tabas 1978, Rudbar 1990, and Bam 2003. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 2015;6(4):415-427

    [5] Lacasse S, Nadim F, Hoeg K. Risk assessment and mitigation in geo-practice. In: Rollins K, Zekkos D, editors. Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art and Practice: Keynote Lectures from GeoCongress 2012; March 25-29 2012. Oakland, California: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2012

    [6] Woo G. Operational earthquake forecasting and risk management. Seismological Research Leters. 2010;81(5):778-782

    [7] Lacasse S, Nadim F. Learning to live with Geohazards: From research to practice. In: Juang CH, Phoon KK, Puppala JA, Green AR, Fenton AG, editors. Geo-risk 2011: Risk Assessment and Management, Proceedings of GeoRisk 2011; 26-28 June 2011. Atlanta, Georgia: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2011. pp. 64-116

    [8] Faber MH. Risk and Safety in Civil Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Lectures Notes. Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETHZ; 2003

    [9] Beck U. World at risk: The new task of critical theory. Development and Society. 2008; 37(1):1-21

    [10] Lacasse S. Hazard, reliability and risk assessment-research and practice for increased safety. In: Keynote Lectures at the 17th Nordic Geotechnical Meeeting; 25-28 May 2016. Reykjavik, Iceland; 2016

    [11] Ibrion M, Mokhtari M, Parsizadeh F, Nadim F. Timescape of the earthquake disasters in Iran: The intricacies of earthquake time and earthquake disaster risk reduction. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography. 2015;97(1):197-216

    [12] Ibrion M, Parsizadeh F, Pakdaman Naeini M, Mokhtari M, Nadim F. Handling of dead people after two large earthquake disasters in Iran: Tabas 1978 and Bam 2003- Survivors' perspectives, beliefs, funerary rituals, resilience and risk. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2015;11:60-77

    [13] Beck U. Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. Great Britain: Sage Publication; 1992

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark