Expert risk perceptions and the social amplification of risk: A case study in invasive tree pests and diseases

Article English OPEN
Urquhart, Julie ; Potter, Clive ; Barnett, Julie ; Fellenor, John ; Mumford, John ; Quine, Christopher P. (2017)
  • Publisher: Elsevier
  • Journal: Environmental Science & Policy, volume 77, pages 172-178 (issn: 1462-9011, eissn: 1873-6416)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC5637881, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.020
  • Subject: Expert risk perceptions | Tree health | H1 | G1 | Ash dieback | Oak Processionary moth | GE | Article | Social amplification of risk

The Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) is often used as a conceptual tool for studying diverse risk\ud perceptions associated with environmental hazards. While widely applied, it has been criticised for implying that\ud it is possible to define a benchmark ‘real’ risk that is determined by experts and around which public risk\ud perceptions can subsequently become amplified. It has been argued that this objectification of risk is particularly\ud problematic when there are high levels of scientific uncertainty and a lack of expert consensus about the nature\ud of a risk and its impacts. In order to explore this further, this paper examines how ‘experts’ – defined in this case\ud as scientists, policy makers, outbreak managers and key stakeholders – construct and assemble their understanding\ud of the risks associated with two invasive tree pest and disease outbreaks in the UK, ash dieback and oak\ud processionary moth. Through semi-structured interviews with experts in each of the case study outbreaks, the\ud paper aims to better understand the nature of information sources drawn on to construct perceptions of tree\ud health risks, especially when uncertainty is prevalent. A key conclusion is that risk assessment is a socially-mediated,\ud relational and incremental process with experts drawing on a range of official, anecdotal and experiential\ud sources of information, as well as reference to past events in order to assemble the risk case. Aligned\ud with this, experts make attributions about public concern, especially when the evidence base is incomplete and\ud there is a need to justify policy and management actions and safeguard reputation.
  • References (62)
    62 references, page 1 of 7

    BC, 2013. Aerial Spraying of Woodland near Pangbourne to Control Oak Processionary Moth. Butterfly Conservation.

    Barnett, J., Weyman, A., 2015. Communication Challenges Associated With the Expression of Uncertainty in the Plant Health Risk Register. Report for FERA. University of Bath.

    Blok, A., Jensen, M., Kaltoft, P., 2008. Social identities and risk: expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use. Public Underst. Sci. 17, 189-209.

    Brasier, C.M., 2008. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathol. 57, 792-808.

    Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77-101.

    Busby, J., Duckett, D., 2012. Social risk amplification as an attribution: the case of zoonotic disease outbreaks. J. Risk Res. 159, 1049-1074.

    Busby, J.S., Onggo, S., 2012. Managing the social amplification of risk: a similation of interacting actors. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1-16.

    Busby, J.S., Alcock, R.E., Macgillivray, B.H., 2009. Interrupting the social amplification of risk process: a case study in collective emissions reduction. Environ. Sci. Policy 12, 297-308.

    Chandelier, A., Helson, M., Dvorak, M., Gischer, F., 2014. Detection and quantification of airborne inoculum of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus using real-time PCR assays. Plant Pathol. 63, 1296-1305.

    Creswell, J.W., 2013. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, California.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    University of Gloucestershire, Research Repository - IRUS-UK 0 3